links for 2007-12-22

Tags

More like this

Hope in a box: The A.V. Club's guide to holiday gifts for the new era of good feelings | The A.V. Club "Words like "need" or "necessary" lose all meaning around Christmas, even when the economy is collapsing. For example, does anyone actually need a flexible plastic case to prevent their bananas…
A Wily Road Warrior's Airport Tips Frank Luntz on how to survive modern air travel. (tags: travel society US) Drivers on cell phones clog traffic I am shocked-- shocked!-- to learn that talking on the phone impairs drivers. (tags: psychology US stupid science news) Jon Swift: Best Blog Posts…
Southern Baptists Back a Shift on Climate Change - New York Times '[T]he new declaration, which will be released Monday, states, "Our cautious response to these issues in the face of mounting evidence may be seen by the world as uncaring, reckless and ill-informed."' (tags: politics religion…
The Final Frontier: The Science of Star Trek: Scientific American "To get a sense of how much actual science has made its way into the science fiction universe of Star Trek, ScientificAmerican.com spoke to Lawrence Krauss, author of The Physics of Star Trek, the first edition of which appeared on…

Did the person who posted this read through the first article, by any means? As a Literature student who loves poetry, I think it rings surprisingly true. The author could have been a bit more tactful, but in the end he'd be making the same point, and this is the best way to make it. Poetry is far more complex than prose. It's tiring, but the depth and richness make up for it. You feel like you've learned or experienced something. Popular fiction doesn't do that. It's a different universe altogether, really.

I read the first article, and while I am not without sympathy for people seeing a beloved genre wither away, in the end, the quoted comment boils down to "People who do not share my tastes in litereature are Bad People."

I don't deny that there's a huge difference between poetry and prose, but I don't think that the difference in reading and writing styles makes poetry any more inherently valuable than prose, or its loss more lamentable. And I find the claim that the lack of interest in poetry reflects a general coarsening of the reading public rather than, say, the failure of poets to write anything that people want to read to be faintly offensive.

But then, I don't read much poetry, so what do I know?

Poetry is like SF: the yawn-to-great stuff ratio is higher than in other kinds of literature and people dont read much nowadays. (But I guess similar kindo of argument can be made about lots of things, for example classical music).

Christopher Hitchems is a disgrace.