DAMOP Wrap-Up

I thought about tacking this onto the end of the previous post, but decided it deserved a space of its own. So, how was the meeting on the whole?

All in all, I thought it was a very good meeting. There wasn't anything stunning and new in the talks that I saw-- there were some very impressive results, and some excellent talks, but most of it was stuff that's clearly in line with research that's been going for a while. There was a lot of really interesting physics presented at the meeting, though, and I'm sure I missed a lot of good stuff, too, because of the highly parallel nature of the sessions.

In terms of the organization, the meeting rooms in the Nittany Lion Inn seemed to be a little cramped for a lot of the talks. The big ballroom in particular felt like it wasn't really big enough. On the other hand, though, the poster sessions were the best in recent memory-- the space was actually large enough to move around relatively freely, and it was maintained at a reasonable temperature. The beer was good, too, and the zealousness of the ID checking was amusing.

DAMOP in general is in sort of a weird position. The meeting has gotten a lot bigger in recent years (it's been growing since cooling and trapping exploded in the early 90's), and this one probably topped 1,000 attendees (I'm not sure the exact number, but it's been right around that for a few years, and this meeting felt bigger than the last few). It's sort of straining the capacity of the university facilities that they like to use for these meetings (to keep costs down), but not quite big enough for really big conference centers.

I'm not sure what the future will hold. Next year is in Charlottesville, VA, another university site, and I think the year after may be at Rice in Houston. I don't see the meeting getting a whole lot bigger than it already is-- I'd be a little surprised if we break 2,000, and shocked if we broke 5K. They may need to fiddle with the organization a little to accommodate the numbers, though.

I didn't make it to the business meetings on Friday, though, so I don't know what if anything was decided. Anybody with actual knowledge is encouraged to share it in the comments, otherwise, I'll just wait to be surprised...

Tags

More like this

I'm leaving this afternoon for Charlottesville, VA and the 40th annual DAMOP conference. At this meeting, we will once again be confirming the prediction of the bosonic character of interesting talks. Bosons, as you know, are quantum particles that happily occupy the same state as other bosons, and…
The conference I'm at this week is the annual meeting of the Division of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics of the American Physical Society (which this year is joint with the Canadian version, the Division of Atomic and Molecular Physics and Photon Interactions, or "DAMPΦ." The Greek letter…
I was pleasantly surprised at how well the What does Science Online Want to Be? post was received-- I kind of expected that to cause more anger than it did. It did prompt a lot of discussion, most of it during the dinner hour in Chateau Steelypips, so it was really hard for me to keep up. Given the…
I didn't take the DSLR to March Meeting with me, but I did throw a point-and-shoot in my bag. A few of these are still just cell-phone snapshots, because I didn't have the bag with me all the time. 193/366: Stadium View When I checked into the hotel, they told me I had a "stadium view" room on the…

There's no place you could physically put 1000 people at Rice. I wonder who thought it would be a good idea to suggest it.