There's another paper about the Fermi Paradox highlighted on the arXiv blog today. This one describes extensive numerical simulations which purport to show that no more than 1,000 spacefaring civilizations can be exploring the galaxy with non-replicating slower-than-light robotic probes.
Of course, this is highly contingent on a bunch of assumptions about the behavior of these imagined aliens. Enough so that the numbers seem to be pulled out of the air-- why would you assume that robotic probes last 50 million years? What makes that a reasonable figure?
It's clear that the authors have put a lot of work into this, but I have a hard time taking this seriously. It's just a little too... science-fictional. There are just too many unjustified assumptions going into the whole thing for it to have any real meaning. I suppose it does put limits on the existence of civilizations who think just like physicists on Earth, but it's not at all clear why we should expect aliens to be that way.
- Log in to post comments
You mean like, "non-replicating?"
I think the idea is that, because we see convergence in evolution despite environmental differences on earth (dolphins swim through water using the same motions birds use in the air, eyes end up similar everywhere, etc), and because the laws of physics and chemistry are universal, an intelligent civilization will inevitably end up with certain parallels to us. I don't buy the idea either (after all, a scientist 100 years ago would never have predicted the microchip, so why should we think we can predict our own development, much less someone else's), but I guess they have to start with SOME assumptions.
Sadder still, Analog has a monthly Science Fact column, which has published from luminaries such as Hoagland.
If you can't do better, you have a problem.
Sounds very similar to the justifications behind the Drake equation. Maybe it makes sense if we have all the assumptions correct but some of the assumptions (like "the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space") aren't exactly predictable with an N of 1.