User Poll: What Should ScienceBlogs Add?

The Corporate Masters are considering some steps to take ScienceBlogs more in a community/ social network/ Web 3.14/ whatever direction, and have asked us our opinions of various potential features. I have opinions on the subject, but they're ultimately less important than the opinions of you, the readers. So here's an attempt to generate some reasonably concise feedback (all of the proposed features would be totally optional-- they're not talking about mandatory registration, and I will fight it tooth and nail if they do):

What we would really like, of course, is to have a rank-ordered list of preferences, but I can't generate that with PollDaddy. In an attempt to kludge together a really rudimentary rank ordering, though, I'll put two more polls below the fold:

First, pick the one feature you would MOST like to see added. That is, which of the items being considered should be the highest priority?

Finally, pick the feature you would LEAST like to see added. That is, which of the proposed features would be the biggest waste of time for our crack technical team?

Thanks in advance for your feedback. Even imperfect feedback will probably improve the final product.

More like this

As you've all already heard, Scienceblogs.com is thinking about introducing some new technical functionalities, including some community-building gadgets. Now, you should go to this post on Page 3.14 and give your feedback. There is a poll there that you can do - it is a little unusual: you vote…
Over the last few weeks, the support staff at ScienceBlogs have been making plans to add a new dimension to the ScienceBlogs experience. In the next three to four weeks, they'll be creating and unveiling a user registration program with Six Apart, the makers of Movable Type, over the entire…
It looks like ScienceBlogs will be getting a lot more community-like and a lot less we-talk-you-listen -- and that's a very good thing. Since we're listening, we'd also like your feedback on how we should set up our community. As you may have heard from one of our bloggers, ScienceBlogs will soon…
I was thinking about something only tangentially related to grading, when it struck me that the way we go about generating student grade point averages is the kind of mind-bogglingly stupid system that requires lots of smart people working together to produce. Two very different groups of smart…

The most important principle of software engineering is to fix bugs before adding new features. And that's what scienceblogs needs to do. Preview is broken on several blogs, preview ruins html character entity references, long threads take ridiculous amounts of time to load , waiting for sb to reload a thread after clicking "post" takes much longer than loading the same thread from scratch, the site goes through frequent periods of unreliability ... I could go on all day.

Comment tracking would be useful - I don't usually remember to go back and check if anyone's replied to something I've said, and the go back and check strategy isn't useful for replies that aren't made for a while.

The other thing is better search. Specifically, it would be nice to be able to sort results by post date, or something similar.

\TeX \TeX \TeX !

Nice.. Ilove this page ;)

By bursa evden ev… (not verified) on 29 Aug 2009 #permalink

Also: threaded comments!

It's next to impossible to navigate in large threads in some blogs (*cough* Pharyngula *cough*).

By Alex Besogonov (not verified) on 29 Aug 2009 #permalink

Forums! (With LaTeX, of course). That would take care of most of the above. Especially if the comments for each post were taken care of by the forum software (and linked from/viewable in the posts).

A note on my vote against "polls and quizzes": polls are ok, and many of you make good use of them. Quizzes might actually make me come here less.

If they must alter it, the following (and nothing else) get my vote:

1. Proper search function integrated into the site (no more Google custom search please!)
2. List of allowed HTML tags and restrictions.
3. OpenID (although now that TypeKey is accepting OpenID login credentials this isn't so bad).

I don't want another Facebook.