Non-Dorky Poll: Vote Reporting

As James Nicoll is fond of saying, context is for the weak. So here's a context-free poll regarding the reporting of election results:

If you'd like to explain what context you might imagine this to have in the comments, that could be fun to see.

More like this

No Links Dump today because a combination of work and a nasty cold kept me off the Internet most of yesterday. Here's the moral equivalent, though: a poll question brought to you by the letters "U" and "K" and the song "Gimme Sympathy" by Metric: Who would you rather be?online surveys The song is…
Over in LiveJournal Land, James Nicoll is pining for the good old days: I'm going through one of my "I would kill for some new SF" phases, SF in this case being defined in a narrow and idiosyncratic way. In particular, I want the modern version of those old SF stories where SF writers, having just…
We've discussed implicit attitudes on Cognitive Daily before, but never in the context of food. The standard implicit attitude task asks you to identify items belonging to two different categories. Consider the following lists. Use your mouse to click on items which are either pleasant or related…
(This entry was originally posted in May, 2006) We've discussed implicit attitudes on Cognitive Daily before, but never in the context of food. The standard implicit attitude task asks you to identify items belonging to two different categories. Consider the following lists. Use your mouse to click…

I don't see how any scientist could pick any option but to release the vote counts. It just isn't right to publish your results but then declare that no one can ever see the raw data!

It just isn't right to publish your results but then declare that no one can ever see the raw data!

That is precisely the argument against touch-screen voting machines, and one of the reasons why that type of voting machine is banned in New Hampshire.

By Eric Lund (not verified) on 04 May 2010 #permalink

The vote counts aren't the raw data: That would be the ballets.

I picked "Cruel and Unusual".

But only because I went out of my way to vote multiple times for Lunar Laser Ranging on your "Cool Laser Applications" Poll.

Now I'm sad.

I think it totally depends on the context. Elections for public office of course. You have to release all the vote totals.

Listing the results in say elections for homecoming queen where you have no control over your nomination in high school is cruel and unusual. In some attempt to do try and make high school more fair, all student groups got to nominate someone for homecoming queen. Without my consent, I became the debate team nominee for homecoming queen. I was not allowed to drop out and I really don't want to know how much I lost by. I'm not sure I even voted for myself.

Things like condo board and nonprofit boards where its a miracle if you have actual competition is a gray area.

By katydid13 (not verified) on 04 May 2010 #permalink

I'm a jellyfish like katydid13.