Is Google making us stupid?-What the Internet is doing to our brains

Nicholas Carr set out to explore how the ubiquity of text on the Internet is affecting our brains, after realizing that his increased Internet use may be affecting his ability to concentrate on reading long, detailed texts. His essay is published in the July/August issue of The Atlantic

"Over the past few years I've had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain," he says. "The deep reading that use to come naturally has become a struggle."

As the Internet becomes a universal conduit for most of the information that flows through our eyes and ears, it seems to be chipping away at our capacity for concentration and contemplation.

While we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition, a recently published study of online research habits, conducted by scholars from University College London, suggests that we may well be in the midst of a sea change in the way we read and think.

Read the full article.

More like this

That's the title of an interesting article from the current issue of The Atlantic, written by Nicholas Carr: Over the past few years I've had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn't…
I've got a review of The Shallows, a new book by Nicholas Carr on the internet and the brain, in the NY Times: Socrates started what may have been the first technology scare. In the "Phaedrus," he lamented the invention of books, which "create forgetfulness" in the soul. Instead of remembering for…
Via Rag & Bone Blog By Christopher Tovo Are we falling out of love with books? I realized a little while ago - when yet another book arrived from Amazon and was thrown on the to-read pile - that I'm no longer the bibliophile I once was. I love the idea of reading books, but I'm not making time…
The article is here, but it is too long for me and my attention span to read through. I got a snippet, though: But that boon comes at a price. As the media theorist Marshall McLuhan pointed out in the 1960s, media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but…

He may be on to something. I've found that over the years I've less stomach for the pretentiousness of the Atlantic. Maybe I'm getting dumber. Or maybe not.

By Matt Platte (not verified) on 23 Jun 2008 #permalink

Yet he expects people to read his article. And wastes the first page on anecdotes, which he admits "don't prove much." Seems to me if he believes his own argument he'd pack the front with what facts he has - it wouldn't have taken much. As someone who reads blogs a lot, and still can get through 800 pages in a day (if that day is Saturday), I don't buy his argument. Maybe there's something to it, but I'd say it's habit and believing we can "multitask" - and that that's a good thing - more than "rewiring".

That is a good point! To add, I don't think it matters how we get the knowledge, or where we get it from nor debate about if those ways are making us dumb. Frankly, when I spend 5 hours in the library while my head is buried in the books and bookshelves, I don't feel any smarter either.

By Betul Kacar (not verified) on 24 Jun 2008 #permalink

Karen, I realized that I learned the word 'ubiquitin' before a word 'ubiquity'. :)

By Zhanetta Astakhova (not verified) on 11 Jul 2008 #permalink

Hi Zhanetta,
Since I work on the ubiquitin protein, I must say that I'm quite happy about your statement :)