Find Out Where They Stand on the Issues that Really Matter

As the 2008 elections swing into full gear, Scientists and Engineers for America (SEA) today launched a new resource--the Science, Health And Related Policies (SHARP) Network--which allows you to track how various elected officials and candidates stack up on a variety of science and health policy issues. SEA was formed a couple of months before the 2006 election in order to support science-friendly candidates, advocate for the proper use of science in formulating government policy, and to oppose political interference in science. SEA made quite a splash then, but its newest endeavor looks to be particularly useful. Here's what SEA has to say about it:

Scientists and Engineers for America has just launched the Science Health And Related Policies (SHARP) Network. The SHARP Network is a wiki-based system that will allow the public to track the positions their elected officials have taken on critical science and health issues. There are already over 500 web pages in the Network including one for every Senator, Congressman, and Presidential candidate. We have also launched pages with information on key science and health issues and for Senate and House committees. We will soon launch pages for candidates for office as well. Not sure what your congressman has said or done about global warming? Look it up on their SHARP page. If it's not there, then you can help by adding it.

Those "over 500 web pages" are already closer to 600, I'm told, but since this is a wiki-based system, anyone can contribute (instructions here), and the site could grow quite a bit. Currently, there are pages for members of the House and Senate as well as presidential candidates. Here are the sites for the Democrats: Barack Obama, John Edwards, and Hillary Clinton. And, here are those for the generally less science-friendly Republicans: John McCain, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and--if your stomach is feeling particularly strong today--fervent creationist Mike Huckabee. Each page gives a summary of the candidate's stances and actions on the issues as well as excerpts from debates and links to speeches.

Here you can see expert politician Mitt Romney equivocate with the best of them on evolution:

In an interview in May 2007 with The New York Times, Romney said "I believe that God designed the universe and created the universe. And I believe evolution is most likely the process he used to create the human body." When asked if that belief meant intelligent design, he responded, "I'm not exactly sure what is meant by intelligent design. But I believe God is intelligent and I believe he designed the creation. And I believe he used the process of evolution to create the human body."

And on embryonic stem cell research:

Romney does not support the use of cloned embryos for research, but believes it is ethical to use embryos taken from fertility clinics to extract stem cells. He supports the ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research while supporting federal funding for research for extracting stem cells through other processes such as altered nuclear transfer and direct reprogramming. In June 2007, Governor Romney wrote a piece for The National Review Online that highlighted his ideas on stem cell research.

At the time he ran for governor of Massachusetts, however, Romney did support embryonic stem cell research. At a bioethics forum in June 2002, he said, "I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research," he said, adding, "I'd be happy to talk to [President Bush] about this, though I don't know if I could budge him an inch."

Beyond the glamour of the presidential race, there are hundreds of pages on members of the House and Senate. I can check out the page on my former Congressman Chet Edwards, for example, and see that he lives up to his reputation as a friend of science. So, if you want to find out how one of your elected officials stands on some of the more important issues facing the US, check out the site. And, if you can't find what you're looking for, feel free to contribute yourself.

More like this

Last month, a group of prominent scientists launched the new organization Scientists and Engineers for America (SEA). The organization has already received quite a bit of press (including a nice article in The New York Times, but I would be remiss if I didn't give them a shout out and let readers…
It's by Matthew Nisbet, and it's about the changing politics of the stem cell issue in the wake of the Hwang scandal. The gist: The public had grown quite supportive of embryonic stem cell research, but the 2004 electoral campaign polarized the issue, and now the Korean fraud story has potential to…
As 2008 approaches, many of the Republican contenders for the Presidency will try to paint themselves as moderates. An article in today's Washington Post, though, underlines why we should be weary of their empty rhetoric. Romney, who is expected to formally enter the presidential race today in…
As I've observed before, with this election cycle's crop of GOP candidates, when general election time arrives, it's going to be difficult to employ the traditional Republican strategy of claiming that the Democratic rival is a "flip flopper." A leading example is Mitt Romney. First the former MA…

As the 2008 elections swing into full gear, Scientists and Engineers for America (SEA) today launched a new resource--the Science, Health And Related Policies (SHARP) Network--which allows you to track how various elected officials and candidates stack up on a variety of science and health policy issues.

This is Great! It is just the kind of thing that everyone has been calling for. This can save the time and money of us science advocates by us not spending time preaching to the choir and by also getting insights as to what would be the best approach for those not in the choir! I hope a lot of other bloggers pick up on and spread the word on this! Thanks!
Dave Briggs :~)

I am guess I am not surprised that enemies of science are not labeled such as long as they are liberals. Senator Mikulski from Maryland has been waging war on science repeatedly as it relates to clones. Meat and milk from clones has been found to be safe, yet this senator wants the FDA to reject the science and ban these from the food supply. She is no different than the conservatives who wanted to keep out the morning after pill of the HPV vaccine.