I Don't See You, So You Can't See Me

Apparently, the Bush Administration has adopted a sophisticated new strategy for not dealing with global warming. From The New York Times:

White House Refused to Open Pollutants E-Mail

The White House in December refused to accept the Environmental Protection Agency's conclusion that greenhouse gases are pollutants that must be controlled, telling agency officials that an e-mail message containing the document would not be opened, senior E.P.A. officials said last week.

The document, which ended up in e-mail limbo, without official status, was the E.P.A.'s answer to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that required it to determine whether greenhouse gases represent a danger to health or the environment, the officials said.

The sad thing is that it looks like it sort of worked:

This week, more than six months later, the E.P.A. is set to respond to that order by releasing a watered-down version of the original proposal that offers no conclusion. Instead, the document reviews the legal and economic issues presented by declaring greenhouse gases a pollutant.

But, that's beside the point. The real dilemma I'm faced with here is deciding whether the White House's tactics are more reminiscent of a passive-aggressive disgruntled employee or a four-year-old. I guess they're a little of both.

More like this

From today's New York Times, and article headlined "White House Refused to Open Pollutants Email": The White House in December refused to accept the Environmental Protection Agency's conclusion that greenhouse gases are pollutants that must be controlled, telling agency officials that an e-mail…
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Massachusetts et al. v. EPA. In the case, several state governments are suing the EPA for failing to regulate CO2 as a greenhouse gas. There are many levels of legal conflict on which the justices could rule, summarized in the NYTimes coverage:…
With the Supreme Court deciding yesterday to hear a case challenging the Bush administration's enforcement of the Clean Air Act (Times coverage here, Post here), the Center for American Progress has issued the following Talking Points memo framing the issue of climate change around PUBLIC…
A little over a week ago the Environmental Protection Agency sent the White House its finding that global warming endangers public health and welfare. This doesn't sound like news, and except for a minority of scientists out there it is very, very old news. But in the context of a 2007 Supreme…

Most people outgrow the "I can't see you, so you can't see me" thing by age 18 months or so.........

By themadlolscientist (not verified) on 25 Jun 2008 #permalink

It is, basically, the ultimate in Denialism.

I'd like to know a bit more though, about who exactly was responsible for this. Presumably some person or persons at the White House actually read the offending e-mail, and made the decision to leave it in limbo, but other than some digs at the Spokesman Fratto, there doesn't seem to be much more information than that....

It is the executively privileged equivalent of "Lalalalalala-I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"