Fundamentally Too Fast

After announcing in September that they had detected neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light, OPERA researchers immediately set out to replicate their results. On Uncertain Principles, Chad Orzel says they reconfigured the neutrino beam, which originally fired 10,000-nanosecond pulses, "to produce much, much shorter pulses—less than 10ns. And while they've only been running this way for a few weeks, they've already got 20 neutrino detections from the shorter pulses, and they see exactly the same timing anomaly." This confirmation rules out problems with the original experimental design, showing that the OPERA results are at least self-consistent. On Starts With a Bang, Ethan Siegel says there could still be a "systematic error in their expected delay calculations, which may be due to something like the atomic clocks, the measurement of the baseline distance, an electronics triggering mishap, or some other mundane reason akin to these." Independent results from an experiment called MINOS could confirm or contradict OPERA's findings in two years, but for now we can wonder: why would a subatomic particle exceed Einstein's speed limit by .0002 percent?

More like this

One of the more reasonable criticisms of the OPERA result showing neutrinos apparently moving faster than light was that they were claiming 20-nanosecond resolution on the timing of a neutrino pulse that was 10000 nanoseconds long. They got their timing by doing fits to the shape of the whole pulse…
Last month, a team of researchers announced that their neutrinos appeared to be travelling faster than the speed of light. Ethan Siegel explains that the mass of a neutrino is "less than one-millionth the mass of the electron, but still not equal to zero" and "should move at a speed…
If 3σ results are wrong half the time, does that mean 6σ results are wrong all the time? The social networks are a-buzz over the claim of a significant detection by the OPERA experiment of a neutrino pulse propagating superluminally over a 750 km baseline from CERN to the Gran Sasso lab. arXiv…
Q: "Why don't physicists shield themselves from neutrinos?" A: "Because they never see them coming." #neutrinojokes Over the past two months, we've talked more about neutrinos than ever before thanks to an extraordinary claim that neutrinos have been observed to move faster-than-light! And as you…

If you look back at much of the older work you'll find that the idea of light speed being the cosmic speed limit and independent of the sources movement was unfounded at best. It is simplty a matter of perspective instead of relativity. The book Eâ mc2 ("E" is not equal to mc2 )
outlines the arguement clearly. (amazon.com) If you go to my blog at relativity-lightspeed.com there is a good translation of Einsteins early paper with my comments inserted. A good read.

Bill McKee