In 2002, when Randy Olson wrote an Op-Ed for the L.A. Times one of the ways he described the shifting baselines phenomenon was in terms of weight: If your ideal weight used to be 150 pounds and now it's 160, your baseline -- as well as your waistline -- has shifted. And indeed it has.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
In his 2002 Op-Ed in the LA Times, Randy Olson wrote about the concept of shifting baselines and uses this analogy: "If your ideal weight used to be 150 pounds and now it's 160, your baseline--as well as your waistline--has shifted." But get this:
Due to global climate change (which has cascaded…
On this eve of a national gorging on junk food comes a quote from a Halloween past...
THEN (1883): "One of the physiological traits of the American is the absence of obesity. Walk the streets of New York, Boston, Philadelphia: of 100 individuals you will meet hardly one who is obese and more often…
Why the Washington Post decided to devote space to libertarian crankery from the Pacific Research Institute, I'll never know, but today's op-ed from Sally Pipes on the evils of governmental interference in diet is a bit much.
The way I see it, obesity cranks recycle 3 arguments over and over. It…
The NYTimes ran an excerpt of a book called Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight Loss -- and the Myths and Realities of Dieting by Gina Kolata. Having read the excerpt -- I haven't read the whole book -- I take issue with how Kolata frames the issue of the genetics of obesity.
My problem…
This posting reminded me of another new normal-- Check out http://www.daveramsey.com/shop/images/products/decal_debt_normal_lg.gif
The point is that normal isn't necessarily a good thing.
(I heard about this slogan from a friend of mine. Admittedly, the website is overly commercial, but I've heard pretty good things about his radio show. Unlike Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh, he's not just agitating people for the sake of publicity and ratings-- He's trying to get them to change their lives for the better.)