- Log in to post comments
More like this
You'd have to be mentally deficient to believe Japan's claims that their hunting of 900 whales is being done for "research" purposes. But how far should people go to stop the slaughter? The Australian government has condemned the killing. People have waged protests. But it seems nothing can stop…
According to BBC news, a Japanese fleet has instructions to kill 1,000 whales, including 50 humpbacks, which have been spared from hunting since the 1960s. A 2003 study in Science estimated there used to 240,000 humpbacks in the North Atlantic pre-whaling. Now there are 10,000. Can anyone help…
A Japanese whaling fleet recently set sail amidst much local fanfare, but Greenpeace is yet again determined to interfere with the hunt by placing themselves in between the whales and the Japanese harpoons. Unlike some other whaling protest groups, Greenpeace relies strictly on peaceful non-violent…
The plight of just two humpback whales that got themselves lost up the Sacramento River has got the nation transfixed. This sort of thing happens every few years. Back in 1988, it was three gray whales trapped in the ice on the north slope of Alaska. It's curious how we, as in news directors, get…
Let's not forget that Greenpeace is out there on the water too. Their vessel, the Esperanza, is trailing the Nissan Maru and fleet, just as they did last year. They draw awareness, without idiotically risking lives like Sea Shepherd.
I'm not even particularly fond of Greenpeace as an organisation. But in this debate they are infinitely more useful and more persuasive than Sea Shepherd, who come across as hysterical and dangerous.
Greenpeace! I apologize for overlooking them. I guess it's due in part to the little media attention they (versus Sea Shepherd) bring the hunt. But you're absolutely right and they certainly deserve recognition in their hot pursuit...
I hate to make this comment again, but it keeps coming back to the Saul Alinski concept of "Total Tactics" (as cited by Mark Dowie in our film with him). You need the whole spectrum of approaches -- from the calm rationality of lawyers and politicians (who don't do a lot of motivating of the general public) to the Sea Shepherd folks who connect with the people who want to see something actually being done. Hysterical and dangerous is one way to view them, but passionate and genuinely frickin' doing something (while the bureaucrats bicker away) is another way.
In a perfect world of smart people and effective legislators there would be no need for Sea Shepherd.
Hi folks.
Thanks for all the very interesting comments. Found you site while reading about the jelly fish.
There is a very interesting web site www.whalesrevenge.com that gives lots of info. and has a petition. Would be pleased if you take a look and also sign the petition.
Thank you very much! :0)
Kind regards.
Signed it!