End the Year with a Sting

Hundreds of beach-going Brazilians were stung by a smack of jellyfish yesterday. "Authorities blamed an extreme heat wave over the southeastern region." Jellyfish smacks and stings: the Christmas gift that keeps on giving (thanks J.R.).

More like this

Christmas is around the bend and the oceans have one gift that keeps on giving: jellyfish. If you're inspired by these ever-increasing medusas (they seem to be on the rise even on land) and you already have the jellyfish moodlamp like me (thanks, sister), here is a relevant gift idea: jellyfish…
>We're going to need a bigger boat, Lion's Mane Jellyfish. cyanea capillata Photo Credit Paul Johnson A swarm of large, stinging jellyfish attacked female swimmers in the World Swimming Championships off of St. Kilda Beach in Melbourne, Australia, Tuesday. Winds blew the jellies, most likely of…
Yesterday, from Seafood.com News: Scientists are criss-crossing the Irish Sea on ferries, counting stinger jellyfish which are blamed for wiping out salmon stocks...Scientists suspect global warming is the principal cause of the jellyfish shoals...The Natural Environment Research Council has given…
Bluebottle jellyfish, Physalia utriculus Also known as the Portuguese Man O' War. It is not a true jellyfish. It appears that jellyfish numbers are increasing in various oceans of the world. This includes a recent increase in giant Nomura's jellyfish in Japan, rafts of jellyfish that swamped…

Ace! You're right! Even Wikipedia agrees. Any suggestions on how to change the perception? As for jellyfish (or Man o' Wars) as fertilizer, I don't see why not. The Unnatural History of the Sea is full of accounts of fish being used in that way. I don't know how rich in nitrogen levels jellies are, but there is reason to think jellies would be a better source of omega-3 (DHA) than menhaden.

Although Ace is technically right, the generally accepted definition of 'jellyfish' is much more broad. This misrepresentaion may irk some of the more fastidious among us, but I think the inclusive definition is actually useful.
"True" jellyfish are usually described as belonging to the class Scyphozoa. Thus, if we adopt such a definition we would have to exclude not only the MOWs but also the infamous box jellyfish [sic] and the irukandji, which are responsible for most human deaths due to jellies. If we start referring to these headlining animals as non-jellyfish, we're just going to confuse the public.
Many scientists also subscribe to this definition, noting that most of these organisms have similar ecological roles as higher-order carnivores in plankton communities. Although this sweeping definition can create some confusion (e.g. ctenophores, salps), I think it is useful for communicating with the public. Clearly the issues surrounding gelatinous zooplankton in today's oceans apply to more than just scyphozoans, and getting lost in semantics doesn't help with public awareness. If it looks, acts, and swims like a jellyfish, I say we call it a jellyfish. Need to get specific about a particular group or species? That's why we have Latin.

By Lucas Brotz (not verified) on 09 Jan 2008 #permalink

Many scientists also subscribe to this definition, noting that most of these organisms have similar ecological roles as higher-order carnivores in plankton communities