Sushi Tuna Comes with Side Effects

The New York Times' Marian Burros has an article today on high mercury levels in tuna sushi:

Recent laboratory tests found so much mercury in tuna sushi from 20 Manhattan stores and restaurants that at most of them, a regular diet of six pieces a week would exceed the levels considered acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Burros also wrote a complementary article reviewing research on the ills linked to mercury:

Elevated mercury levels may be associated not only with neurological problems but with cardiovascular disease among adults as well...[Another] study also suggested that adults exposed to methylmercury might be at risk for vision loss and numbness of fingers and toes as well as blood pressure and fertility problems.

The deleterious health effects of eating contaminated fish are always of public interest. Burros' article on mercury in tuna sushi was the number one 'most emailed' on the New York Times list today (I can imagine Manhattanites terrified that their cold fingers are a result of too much sushi). But I wonder what all that mercury does to tuna?

Update (January 25th, 2008): According to Intrafish, the National Fisheries Institute (a seafood industry conglomerate) requested The New York Times issue corrections on five aspects of the story they found inaccurate. I find it a little ironic that the NFI accuses the NYTimes of bias...

Tags

More like this

Stop the presses. This sushi debate is getting out of control. I have had to revisit the YouTube of sea otters holding hands to remind myself that almost 10 million humans still have a soul--that it's not all about us and our mercury levels. You probably know what happened. Marian Burros wrote an…
The New York Times has a nice investigative piece on mercury levels in your local urban sushi parlors that briefly restored my faith in mainstream science journalism. The Times performed what you might call a guerilla science action, hiring a pair of local professors to help to analyze bluefin tuna…
In an Slate article critiquing Marian Burros' story about mercury levels in fish, Jack Shafer takes issue with the omission of any discussion of a review published in 2000 in Environmental Research entitled "Twenty-seven Years Studying the Human Neurotoxicity of Methylmercury Exposure". Mr Shafer…
Plenty of fuss has been made in the past few weeks over a New York Times investigation into the health risks of eating sushi, with tuna, and more specifically, bluefin tuna, painted as the biggest villan. The problem is the level of mercury in the fish, and mercury is a nasty neurotoxin. The fuss…

But I wonder what all that mercury does to tuna?

Now you know why they talk about bluefin tuna. ;-)

But I wonder what all that mercury does to tuna?

Now you know why they talk about bluefin tuna. ;-)

Posted by: chezjake | January 23, 2008 9:30 PM

The news in the article is sad, but I am guessing that you are saying that the tuna's fins are blue as an analogue to people's fingers being blue from cold and that is funny! LOL! Clever, very clever!
Dave Briggs :~)