This week, the L.A. Times ran an interesting profile of a sea urchin/sea cucumber fisherman from California. Though the author pushes us to feel sympathy for the aging diver and a declining fishery, any fisherman who was able to send his two sons to "13 years of prep school in Palos Verdes, and then sent them to two of the top liberal arts schools in the nation" cannot have been doing too badly. No, he doesn't have a 401(k) and he might continue to work his whole life, but isn't this simply the modern manifestation of the American Dream?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The Galapagos National Park announced last week that the Ecuadorian government will open sea cucumber fishing in the Galapagos Islands beginning on June 25th for 50 days or two million sea cucumbers, whichever comes first. This news is a disappointment to many conservationists in the islands and…
No one should ever be granted a degree in science without being able to finishing this little gem of an aphorism: "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble...
...It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
Various sources attribute the quote to Mark Twain, or Will Rogers or…
Both Andrew Sullivan and Kevin Drum are wrong, but I think Drum is infuriatingly wrong.
They're arguing over a statistic, the observation that about 46% of Americans believe the earth is 6000 years old and that a god created human beings complete and perfect as they are ex nihilo. Andrew Sullivan…
Let us continue our Ben Domenech bashing. He's got this somewhat high profile gig at the Washington Post, and one has to wonder what his qualifications are. I think we can rule out "intelligence."
GWW made an interesting discovery: he's a creationist. I don't understand why the Right is constantly…
I think that guy sounds cool.
Jennifer...I think the point was that for this fisherman, as with many others, his way of life is on the decline. I suppose one could argue that it was the same with small farmers just prior to WW2 and more recently with auto workers in Detroit. There's a lot of appeal in this description of commercial fishing--the close relationship with a world few experience, the independence and adventure--but it also seems pretty honest about the difficulties. (Financial too--b/c they've committed to paying for an excellent education for their sons does not make them extravagantly rich and it seems to have come at a real price.) Given our environment (economic, social as well as biophysical), I expect that commercial fishermen, like farmers, autoworkers and conservation biologists, are exploiting a niche with no evil intent. I would argue that conservation biology's best contribution here would be to reform that commercial fishing niche into something that may have a little better longevity than those most exploit currently. Sure, fisheries (and the men and women that make them) bear some responsibility for our current state of affairs, but they aren't solely to blame. I think some sympathy is in order, and, personally, I'd have to admit to some nostalgia too. Cheers, Pete