1. shiftingbaselines
  2. Should More Jellies Fill Your Belly?

Should More Jellies Fill Your Belly?

By jjacquet on April 7, 2008.

The Economist published an article last week on jellyfish, which featured a fellow graduate student at the Fisheries Centre, Lucas Brotz. Can jellyfish really be the future of seafood? Jellyfish only provide about 4 calories per 100 g but, beyond that, there is a real danger of encouraging demand for a product that was spawned from unhealthy and poorly managed oceans...

Jellyfish push out incredibly valuable, and diverse, marine ecosystems. Scientists may somehow turn jellyfish into food, tyres or flip-flops, but it is hard to imagine an industry based on a product that is at least 95% water will ever be economically superior to one based on a diverse and healthy marine ecosystem. In 2004, fish caught in the ocean netted $85 billion on first sale. Do we want to grow an industry that has a vested interest in a very different kind of ocean to the one we have today? The world has to decide what kind of ocean it wants: one thriving with diverse marine life, or one swimming with a few hundred species of jellyfish.

Tags
Losing Track
Seafood

More like this

Greenpeace Rocks
A couple weeks ago, Greenpeace invaded the Brussels Seafood Expo and hung signs calling attention to the dismal state of tuna fisheries. Just a week later, Greenpeace-USA announced its forthcoming publication that ranks U.S. supermarkets in terms of procuring sustainable seafood. This is an…
Jellyfish Bloom and Gloom
Jeremy Jackson calls it "The Rise of Slime". Daniel Pauly sees a future in jellyfish burgers. And given that this week is the 2nd International Jellyfish Bloom Symposium--where D. Pauly will deliver the keynote address (having not been able to attend the 1st symposium in Alabama in 2002)--it…
Baselines, Baselines, Baselines
Three shifting baselines to note today: 1) An article in today's New York Times by Andrew Revkin discusses how "scientists are setting baselines to gauge future effects on the seas." The article is a nice summary of some of the latest attempts to document the decline in ocean health even if it's…
The End of the Line: a must see
On Monday night I went to the cinema and watched the new environmental movie The End of the Line, directed by Rupert Murray. Featuring habitats, scientists and case studies worldwide, it shows how our rampant and poorly controlled (or uncontrolled) exploitation of the global oceans is depleting (…

Jellyfish only provide about 4 calories per 100 g

And yet, they can fuel sufficient growth to produce this!

By Sven DIMilo (not verified) on 07 Apr 2008 #permalink

As heartening as it is to see that some species can flourish on a diet of jellyfish, I really wonder if they'd flourish in an ocean in which we were missing the full compliment of diverse lifeforms which currently flourish as well. Somehow I doubt it, and I'm a little afraid to find out. In the mean time I guess we should "dig in".

Please; they are not a variety of fish. Can't we please call them "sea jellies"? And starfish are not fish either. And Shellfish...

By BlindSquirrel (not verified) on 18 Apr 2008 #permalink

Blind Squirrel,
You nailed Lucas' only complaint about the article. He fully agrees with you that that they should be called 'jellies', which we also support here at SB (note the post's title). This will no doubt have to be settled in the future as they become a more common foodstuff...