The Moment of Truth for BICEP2 (Synopsis)

“The paradigm of physics — with its interplay of data, theory and prediction — is the most powerful in science.” -Geoffrey West

So earlier this year, the BICEP2 team shook up the world by announcing the discovery of primordial gravitational waves: a signal from the earliest stages of the Universe, going all the way back to before the Big Bang!

Image credit:the BICEP2 collaboration, viahttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2014-05. Image credit:the BICEP2 collaboration, viahttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2014-05.

By looking at the photon polarization data, they claimed to have surpassed the gold "5σ" standard for announcing a discovery in physics. But recently, that's been walked back, as there could have been a systematic error at play: simple emission from our own Milky Way.

Later this month, the Planck team will release their results, and either confirm or refute BICEP2. Here's where we stand on the eve of that announcement.

Tags

More like this

“Other than the laws of physics, rules have never really worked out for me.” -Craig Ferguson When you think about the Standard Model of particle physics, you very likely think about all the matter, energy, particles, antiparticles, forces and interactions of the Universe. And you might legitimately…
“Physical reality does not require that we be pleased with its mechanism; we must see the implications of a theory for what they are and not for what we would like them to be.” -Kevin Michel If you've been following along for a while -- particularly in light of the recent BICEP2 results -- you're…
“It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind.” -Albert Einstein In physics, we're always on that quest for the next frontier: the next order of magnitude higher…
“First, you should check out my house. It’s, like, kinda lame, but way less lame than, like, your house.” -Lumpy Space Princess, Adventure Time Billions of years ago, before the Universe contained clusters, galaxies, stars or even neutral atoms, everything was uniform. Almost perfectly uniform,…

What sort of degree of phase shift would be 'normal' for photons travelling from the past into our present time, assuming these reflect the presence of gravitational waves? Considering radio waves (HF) as a guide to my experience, phase shift is common to those signals in a dramatic way, such as the total loss of signal strength when that changes from, say, horizontal to vertical polarization. Another effect is a ground wave arriving before the skip signal turns up, resulting in signal cancellation at times. Another peculiarity is your own signal turning up as your over is finished & you hear the last couple of words you just transmitted.
Would this be a consideration for gravity waves/ photon polarization?

I might be wrong, but from what I read earlier this year, Planck's sensitivity in detecting b-modes is much weaker then bicep2, polar bear and other dedicated detectors, meaning... I'm not sure that their results on b-mode will refute anything. BICEP2 results are wrong because of planks dust maps and foreground polarizations that are available since summer, that weren't available when bicep published the results.

What planck IMO will do, is finally have a complete all sky dust map and foreground polarization data, which will then serve as noise level measure for any upcoming precise and dedicated b-mode measures. On it's own, planck data on that is gonna be very weak since it was never intended for that purpose in the first place.

By Sinisa Lazarek (not verified) on 03 Dec 2014 #permalink

So atm, even with more detailed data from other CMB experiments, we might not be able to do an analysis of polarization data for gravitational waves without a detailed map of the galactic dust that would create the foreground emissions? Guess I'm on the edge of my seat 'till Planck and BICEP2 release their joint analysis. I'm sure the BICEP2 team will think twice before trying to data-scrape someone again after this.

By Bob McGovern (not verified) on 07 Dec 2014 #permalink