O brave new world

So, we've transitioned to the new platform. Jolly good.

However, the last couple of posts (Facebook, and von S) didn't make it across; I've fixed that up, from backup and cache.

I believe that, in theory, comments have come across (except on those two posts). If you think you can see some of yours that haven't, please use this post to note that. Indeed, if you have any comments on the new format, do let me know.

A couple of changes. It looks like the new comment system might be more sane. From my point of view nice changes are:

* I can now close comments on old posts, and have (argh, that hasn't taken effect. I can guess why).
* I've set the auto-approve setting to "those who have already had a comment approved".
* The server seems to be faster - updating posts and comments is quicker.

Irritatingly, at the moment wp isn't emailing me when comments show up needing moderation. I need to fix that. I think it was just slow to wind up. Now its working.

Other stuff: I turned off the Gravatars. I could turn them back on, if anyone cares. Vote in the comments.

There doesn't seem to be a convenient way for you to permalink to your comments. They do have permalinks, its just hard for you to know what they are.

Tags

More like this

Many thanks to commentor Bam who alerted me to A comment by Alex Harvey: CLIMATE CHANGE ARBITRATION BIAS AT WIKIPEDIA by Hans von Storch CLIMATE CHANGE ARBITRATION BIAS AT WIKIPEDIA complete with big shouty letters. [This is a copy from back-up of a post that was on the old mt site, and didn't get…
Why, oh, why is it that it is seemingly impossible for any sort of significant change to the ScienceBlogs collective to occur without major problems? It happened a a few years ago when we underwent the first major template upgrade. Given that experience, it was with great trepidation that I faced…
(Now that I look at the title, that sounds like an incredibly tepid harness-team command. "On, Moderation! Forward, with prudent speed!" I could clear that up by adding "Comment" in the middle, but I kind of like the image...) Over at Boing Boing, Teresa Nielsen Hayden has posted a long explanation…
Dear loyal readers, quiet lurkers, constant commeters, and trolls, On or before the 24th of May (hopefully not later) Scienceblogs.com will under The Branding. The Branding is not a phenomenon found in a cultish horror movie involving corn and a school bus, nor will it involve British schoolboys…

Let us exhort the Stoat to morph into The Hound of the Barkervilles, Times New Romans or Anythingbutarials, long enough to tweak the design pane out of its default font.

Yuck

By Quiet Waters (not verified) on 23 May 2012 #permalink

Just an experiment. If I comment as me, what does it look like?

This format is better.

By David B. Benson (not verified) on 23 May 2012 #permalink

It does "look" nicer, but there's no preview and you can't link to individual posts in (or between) threads (at the mo?). And that's a drawback not outweighed by things looking nicer, IMVHO.

PL: I was going to answer you inline, but weirdly I get "there is no comment with that ID" if I try. So, oddities. I've asked the backroom folk about permalinks to comments. Its an obvious need, so I'm cautiously optimistic it will get fixed. There is probably a lot of scurrying around to fix problems going on now.

Ugh, a major regression, I am afraid, at least from user view.
1) No comment numbers, so no simple back-reference.
2) No convenient permalinks.
3) No count of comments, so one cannot simply look to see if there has been activity.

By John Mashey (not verified) on 24 May 2012 #permalink

And thinking on this change a bit more, I realise (after a visit to Deltoid) that Greasemonkey killfile no longer works!

That loss is worse than all the other bugbears combined.

"3) No count of comments, so one cannot simply look to see if there has been activity."

It's there at the top of the post, and the top of the comments - see the speech bubble with the number in brackets. It's not overly obvious.

Just realised JM you probably meant on the home page, and I agree, it is missing from there, and that would be better.

Adam: yes. I used to be able to stop by, make a quick check of the first few articles on hone page and see if anything new has happened ( without getting deluged by emails), but now that diesn't work.

By John Mashey (not verified) on 25 May 2012 #permalink

Ditto John Mashey. The new look is very sterile, with no hint of the occasional whimsy that makes stoat so readable.

By Paul Kelly (not verified) on 25 May 2012 #permalink