Launch spending

An image from the Economist's Technology Quarterly. Interesting to me: I've been following the Space X (not to be confused with Force X) stuff with great interest. But I hadn't realised that launch was such a tiny fraction of the overall spend.

As a minor tie into the nominal subject of this blog, notice that meteorology is 3% of the satellites. That probably folds in climatology too.

More like this

Early global warming says VV at VV. It is an interesting idea; if you haven't read his post you should. The AR5 radiative forcing graph he includes is interesting too: I hadn't realised the forcing had grown much more strongly after 1950.
Tamino (Open Mind) is a pretty good blog, but I hadn't realised until recently just how scary the denialists find it. As a case in point, I commented at NoTricksZone, who had said: the GLOBAL WARMING STOP has been extended yet another month, now at 17 years and 9 months... Earth to Warmworld. Earth…
For those accustomed to a daily diet of Stoat, my apologies. It is nearly bumps (next week) and M1 is finally getting its 5 outings a week in, so I've been fairly busy. Not only do I have to row, but I'm also faced with the onerous task of being sociable in the Old Spring afterwards. Its a hard…
When I argued for treating GW as economics not morality, I didn't trouble myself to say "and I think it is easier to agree on economics than on morality", because it hadn't occurred to me that people might disagree. But of course, this is the internet, so people do disagree. CIP says so, for…

I imagine some climate relevant satellites are found in "Earth-observation" as well.

[Possible. But the associated articles talk about a lot of others things under "earth obs": crops, cars, etc -W]

I'm surprised too. I had thought the launch costs were quite a big part of the costs. I have, admittedly, never actually checked.

By ...and Then Th… (not verified) on 29 Aug 2016 #permalink

I thought cost of satellites and launch costs were roughly similar so 3* is more than I expected but not all that far off. That there is also costs for ground equipment and astronaut programs is obvious but not something I have really thought about. Initially surprised by how large ground equipment is but perhaps that includes every gps gadget and so on, therefore maybe not surprising in that case. I assume satellite services is mainly salaries and associated costs for marketing and selling the services the satellites provide. Perhaps not too surprising again because you are not going to pay for a launch and satellite unless sure costs can be recovered so sales and costs are likely to swamp launch and satellite cost.