In today's New York Times, A.O. Scott has a wonderful review of The Da Vinci Code which is described as "Ron Howard's adaptation of Dan Brown's best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence". The review features a number of observations that you don't read every day, for example "movies ... rarely deal with issues like the divinity of Jesus or the search for the Holy Grail. In the cinema such matters are best left to Monty Python."
In short, the movie gets panned. Not surprising really. I thought the book was overated, pseudo-historical, chewing gum for the brain.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Odious Catholic League President William Donohue had this to say about the forthcoming Ron Howard film Angels and Demons:
Finally, the pop culture offers many challenges. The film “Angels & Demons,” the prequel to “The Da Vinci Code,” opens May 15. Once again, the tag team of Dan Brown and Ron…
I was just going to leave my plug for the Skeptics' Circle this week stand as my only post today--until I became aware of some serious lunacy:
MUMBAI (AFP) - A Catholic group called on Christians to starve themselves to death in protest at the release of "The Da Vinci Code" at cinemas in India as…
blarg? » Can I Get A Witness
"Look, if you want to save journalism, if you want to be a journalist, you need to actually perform the act of journalism. The kind of writing that we desperately need, that we may be well-informed and responsible citizens, not these bullshit celebrity-noise puff…
It's a good read, also check out MarkCC's review
It's another example of cranks not recognizing talent - or rather the absence of it. And Sean Carroll hits pretty hard in his review making the point that there are so many basic errors in the book that Behe isn't doing ID any favors. He ends with…
I hated the book. It was Umberto Eco Lite. Eco has a much better grasp of both irony and the historical facts - he really likes his alchemists and Kabbalists. Brown seems to have the historical sense of a political journalist.
I agree about Eco. I tell anyone who raves to me about Brown's book to read Foucault's Pendulum (and indeed The Name of the Rose, which is one of my favorite books).
Yes indeed. Reminds me that I need to read The Name of the Rose again; it's been far too long.
What I thought was a shame about The Da Vinci Code was that a competent author probably could have made a halfway decent thriller out of the concepts and characters, but Brown's writing is just painful.
I had a number of problems with this book, mostly based on its lack of originality, and the fact it is not that well written.
And a conspiration with a grand total of three members, from which one is a traitor, sounds somewhat, well, cheap...