Guy Gavriel Kay, Ysabel [Library of Babel]

I read Guy Gavriel Kay's newest book, Ysabel a while ago, but I've been dithering about what to say in the booklog entry. I've been dithering long enough, in fact, that Kate beat me to it, so now I have to post something.

Kay is best known for a set of very loosely connected pseudo-historical fantasy novels, which re-cast important bits of European history in fantasy worlds. My favorite of the lot is probably still Tigana, but the "Sarantine Mosaic," consisting of Sailing to Sarantium and Lord of Emperors is probably the most polished of the lot.

For whatever reason-- he can't have run out of European history yet-- Kay returns to contemporary fantasy with this book. He also returns to his first fantasy series, the Fionavar Tapestry, as two characters from those books reappear. Don't worry if you haven't read them, or don't remember them well-- I didn't even recognize the characters in question, and it didn't really affect my enjoyment of the story.

Ysabel is the story of Ned Marriner, a fifteen-year-old Canadian who's accompanying his world-famous photographer father on a shoot in Provence. One morning, in the Saint-Sauveur Catherdral of Aix-en-Provence, he meets two people: an American girl about his own age, and a mysterious man in a leather jacket, armed with a knife. The girl offers to show him around, and the man threatens to kill them both, because they have "blundered into a corner of a very old story." It wouldn't be much of a novel if they heeded his warning, so soon enough Ned and Kate (the American girl in the book, not my wife) find themselves caught up in a series of mystical events that are bound up with the long and bloody history of the region.

This was a frustrting book in a lot of ways. There were a lot of tantalizing hints about a deep and dark history, but maddeningly few details about some aspects of the story. How often do the events in question repeat? One of the previous repetitions was obviously associated with the Albigensian Crusade, but do they all involve historical bloodbaths? When was the last occurrance? There are hints, but not enough to really figure out what's going on.

The bigger problem, though, is the voice. Kay's prose is brilliantly well suited to his usual subjects, who tend to be poets or bards or artists caught up in momentous events, but it tends toward the epic and melodramatic. This doesn't end up working all that well for describing the thoughts and feelings of a modern Canadian teenager. Once the mystical stuff gets going, it moves along pretty well, but the book takes a while to set things up, and those sections are a little awkward. I's not bad, but he's no Scott Westerfeld when it comes to presenting a teenage point of view.

It's really difficult for me to say what I thought of this book. The writing is very evocative, in terms of mood, and it did draw me in once things started to get weird. There are some things that don't quite fit, though, and I think they keep it from being as good as it might be.

In a way, this feels like it might be a transitional book-- like he might be moving toward writing more modern stuff, but hasn't quite gotten the historical thing out of his system yet. Or it could be a one-off experiment, a book that he wrote just to see if he could do it, and he'll go back to doing the pseudo-historical books that he's more comfortable with. Whichever it is, it feels like it's half in one world, and half in the other, which is oddly appropriate given the subject, but not really ideal from the reader's perspective.

Tags

More like this

Tim Powers is one of those authors who has carved out a niche for himself telling a particular type of story, sort of like Guy Gavriel Kay with his pseudo-historical fantasy novels. In Powers's case, the niche might be summarized as "supernatural secret history." His best novels are set in…
I actually read this months ago, but I'm only just getting around to booklogging it. Which is a problem, because I no longer remember it all that clearly... Elizabeth Bear's previous books were a trilogy of competent neo-Heinlein adventure stories, so it's perfectly logical that her next book,…
I promised a while back to write a post on a topic of your choosing, in exchange for a $30 donation to my DonorsChoose challenge. I've got a fair number of requests, and I should really start paying them off. The first one comes from Ewan McNay, who aks: what quantum mechanics can tell us about the…
It's Hugo nomination season again, which means that I need to come up with a list of works to suggest for SF's premier fan-voted award. It also means that there are lots of publications out there putting out lists of recommended works to help potential Hugo voters narrow their ballots. Last year,…

The last occurence was 70 years ago at most (I left a bookmark in the page but forgot to mention it to you), which kind of rules out them all being bloodbaths, but doesn't help answer the general whys and hows of things.

Well, 70 years ago would put it a bit before WWII, so I suppose there could be a delayed connection to a bloodbath...

There's a hint that once the initial contest is done, the surviving couple lives out a natural life, so that might put a limit on the recurrance time-- maybe they come back again after the previous incarnations die.

There's a hint that once the initial contest is done, the surviving couple lives out a natural life

Yes, which makes a certain revelation even more implausible, but whatever.

I know I liked it a hell of a lot better than his last two or three offerings. And like everything else with Kay, whether or not the style works is a matter of personal taste with very high variance-- I didn't find the tone too terribly grating and I was just overjoyed that I wasn't putting up with the normal cast of modern bards in the dark ages.

I agree with both that the actual mechanics, if you will, of the repeating, recurring stoy are never made clear. That bothered me initially until I made a conscious decision not to let it bother me. The exact details weren't what Kay was interested in telling, and to be honest, I don't think they're what Ned and company would have been interested in, at that moment. Later, yes, definitely, but not over the week or so during which the story is set. And frankly, they had no access to those details anyway.

By John Novak (not verified) on 15 Feb 2007 #permalink

Novak: it's not so much the dates as other things; and anyway, if a writer is telling a story in omniscient, the principal characters' lack of information is not an excuse.

But YMMV.

Point taken about the omniscience, but even so it didn't bother me too much. I was also supremely unconcerned about the actual dates-- it was the mechanism which I resolutely allowed myself not to care about.

Ultimately, I think including those details would have satisfied the more rational and engineering parts of my brain, but this story wasn't written for that aspect of me. It was written much more for the part that recognizes and reacts to archetypes. (Which I suspect is why your elsewhere comment about gender-essentialism falls perfectly flat on my ears.)

By John Novak (not verified) on 15 Feb 2007 #permalink

I know what archetypes are, and I know what gender-essentialism is.

By John Novak (not verified) on 15 Feb 2007 #permalink