Over at the World's Fair, Ben and David have posted results from their taking of the Earth Day Ecological Footprint quiz. Here are my results:
CATEGORY / ACRES
FOOD / 5.4
MOBILITY / 1.7
SHELTER / 6.9
GOODS/SERVICES / 7.9
TOTAL FOOTPRINT / 22IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.9 PLANETS.
At least I'm doing better that the US average ... but that's not really saying very much!
- Log in to post comments
More like this
My earlier post which showed that large numbers of people around the world are skeptical about the "official" story regarding the perpetrators of 9/11 really needs an American baseline as a comparison. I have posted data from a Zogby poll as well as a Pew survey of American Muslims. Note that I…
The World Values Survey has a question about immigration policy with four options:
- Let anyone come
- As long as jobs available
- Strict limits
- Prohibit people from coming
I used WVS 2005-2008 from 57 countries first. Then I filled out the countries with the
Four-wave Aggregate of the Values…
In the post below I combined some of the Census Regions for reasons of sample size. But I decided to do this again without combining, but removing some of the questions because of small sample sizes. Again, I also limited the sample to whites between 1998-2008.
But, I added another category:…
Some debate below about the various parameters which shape social pathologies. One of facts which we are well aware of is that the United States has a lot of homicide compared to other developed countries. But another fact which is also well known is that a disproportionate number of these…
Interesting. I had a 4 acres each person, which would mean a need of 2.2 planets. But I can hardly imagine what to do to reduce it next to a safer bet: stop having electricity? I don't have a car, use mostly common transportations or walk, don't eat meat as often...
I answered the questions in a way that I thought would minimize my footprint and on got down to 1.3 planets. I guess I need to stop eating or something. Has anyone even gotten down to one planet ?
I got down to 1.0 planets, assuming that I never drove or flew and could find six roommates for my little working-class house.
I am carfree, and walk nearly everywhere. For many Americans, going car free is not possible. If this test is correct, it is not sufficient to use less; we must also become far more efficient.
Eric Juve asked: Has anyone ever gotten down to one planet?
Tonight I happened to see an episode of 30 Days called "Off The Grid" where a man from New York and a woman from New Jersey go to live at the Dancing Rabbit Eco-commune for a month. At the start, their lifestyle required the equivalent of 12.5 planets. Tensions ran high especially since he was a hard-core carnivore adjusting to a vegetarian diet and she thought "products" (soap, shampoo, conditioner and the like) were a must. The commune was a fossil fuel free zone so electricity was derived from solar power and cars were fueled with vegetable oil. This way of life only needed the equivalent of 1.3 planets, but it also resulted in infrequent bathing, eating pizza with soysage on it, dumpster diving and everyone literally making garden fertilizer. It would be quite a feat for anyone living in an urban area to get down to one planet. I use public transit almost exclusively and I recycle. Even so, my ecological footprint is 18 (3.9 planets).
I was 3.2, with 1.8 planets needed. I guess this relatively low score is probably because I go everywhere by public transport. This is simply because I live in London.
More precisely:
FOOD 1.3
MOBILITY 0.7
SHELTER 0.5
GOODS/SERVICES 0.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.2
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
Apparently, the score is using mean consumtion rates according to where you live... Therefore it does not really represent your true score.
If you want to be sure, redo the test at some other place around the world...
I discovered it because I tried to redo the test using my home country in EU and my score felt from 2.2 to 1.8 despite the answers being the same.