The War on Science, Part MXCVII

The AP is reporting a further clampdown by the Bush administration on governmental science - in this case, within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). New rules require screening of all facts and interpretations by agency scientists:

The new requirements state that the USGS's communications office must be "alerted about information products containing high-visibility topics or topics of a policy-sensitive nature.''

The agency's director, Mark Myers, and its communications office also must be told -- prior to any submission for publication -- "of findings or data that may be especially newsworthy, have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding to ensure that proper officials are notified and that communication strategies are developed.''

Revere has more.

More like this

by Revere, cross-posted at Effect Measure The Bush Administration hates science. Science is reality-based and some truths are politically inconvenient. But there are things that can be done. Like this: The Bush administration is clamping down on scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey, the latest…
The Bush Administration hates science. Science is reality-based and some truths are politically inconvenient. But there are things that can be done. Like this: The Bush administration is clamping down on scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey, the latest agency subjected to controls on research…
Apparently, facts are getting in the way of BushCo. But does everything need to be cleared by the faith-based intitiatives office? The Bush administration is clamping down on scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey, the latest agency subjected to controls on research that might go against…
The Union of Concerned Scientists has just released a report on the media policies at federal agencies, in order to assess âthe degree of freedom with which science is communicated at federal agencies.â The nonprofit organization analyzed 15 regulatory and science agenciesâ policies governing…

The USGS has long had an internal review system with the objective of ensuring scientific validity of reports. Reports were not supposed to advocate particular actions or policies, which was reasonable. At a meeting the other day about getting one of my latest reports through review, it was brought to my attention that certain "homeland security" concerns need to be addressed if necessary; things like deleting locational information from maps showing sensitive water supplies and so forth. That's sort of reasonable as well. But what I read appears to suggest that scientific findings at odds with Administration policy may be subject to effective censure--something that is not at all in our nation's interest. The ghost of George Deutsch has returned.

The USGS has long had an internal review system with the objective of ensuring scientific validity of reports.

That's the thing. If there is already an effective review process in place then nothing needs to be modified. The modifications are purely for political purposes and providing Bush & Co. the power of censorship for objective (i.e, reality-based) evidence that contradicts administration policy. Bush is a disgrace to this country, the world and the human race.

By Tyler DiPietro (not verified) on 16 Dec 2006 #permalink

Addendum: That last sentence is simple venting and should not be taken as topical to the specific subject but it's part in the formation of my overall opinion of Bush.

By Tyler DiPietro (not verified) on 16 Dec 2006 #permalink