Razib presents some interesting data on donations to the two main political parties by scientists. What struck me is that if you rank the professions from most Republican to most Democrat, you get the following:
- Civil Engineering [0.75]
- Chemical Engineering [0.79]
- Geology [0.92]
- Mechanical Engineering [0.96]
- Electrical Engineering [1.17]
- Chemistry [2.31]
- Biochemistry [5.09]
- Mathematics [5.44]
- Physics [6.19]
- Biology [10.3]
Now what I find interesting here is that if we use the Discovery Institute's 2007 list of 700 Dissenters against Darwinism, we see that the top five groups represented are (in order): engineers, chemists, physicists, MDs, and mathematicians. Biomedical and molecular and cellular biology folks trail significantly and organismal biologists (who actually may have some professional background in studying evolution) barely exist on the list.
The similarity between the two sets of rankings is - to me at least - interesting.
Categories
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I was poking around Fund Race 2008 and was curious how different scientist professions were giving in regards to political parties in the USA. Below is what I found....
profession
Repub #
Dem #
Repub $
Dem $
Ratio #
Dem $
mathematician
18
98
13740
72837
5.44
5.3
physicist
86
532
65722…
Most readers are probably aware of the Discovery Institute’s "Dissent from Darwinism" statement which now has 700 signatories willing to claim
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the…
Jim Zoes was kind enough to send me the data on English homicide rates
that he obtained from the Home Office. I've typed it in and included
it at the end of this message.
The numbers are certainly higher than those recorded in the WHO
Statistical Yearbook. I'll try to find out why, but for now I…
In the post below I combined some of the Census Regions for reasons of sample size. But I decided to do this again without combining, but removing some of the questions because of small sample sizes. Again, I also limited the sample to whites between 1998-2008.
But, I added another category:…
old earth creations also have the same trend. creationists are in the "applied sciences" or quasi-sciences (mathematics).
Do you have a theory regarding the reason for this?
The Republican/ID correlation seems strongest for engineers. Out of Razib's list, the only groups of scientist that aren't represented on the Discovery Institute's list are geologists, biochemists, and biologists - and paleontology is often part of the geology curriculum. (And although ID and young-Earth creationism aren't exactly the same thing, geologists are very unlikely to be YECs. And the petroleum geologists, who are still the largest group of employed geologists, deal with things older than 6000 years all the time.)
American politics is so depressing. I said this to an American I was chatting with and he replied "Didn't two of your political parties have their own military wings?". It turns out he studies international politics :(
Enda Kenny of Fine Gael said something like this to the Sinn Féin MEP Mary Lou McDonald on Questions and Answers. She was talking about the Treaty being a treat to Irish neutrality when he said "That's pretty rich when you consider that Sinn Féin has its own private army" to boos and hisses. That was exciting, it's a shame the vote is over