Taking over Torpig

In early 2009, a bunch of folks at UCSB took over the Torpig botnet for ten days. In that time, they observed more that 180,000 infections and recorded over 70G of data that the botnet captured. During that time, over 8,000 accounts at financial institutions were "acquired".

The report is available online [pdf]


More like this

I haven't talked about Big Shitpile (the housing-initiated economic collapse in a while), but this report from the Essex County Register of Deeds (Massachusetts) describes nothing less than the breakdown of the property title system in the U.S.: Yesterday at the Annual Conference of The…
The Washington Post continues its sorry record on the Lancet study with this piece by Sarah Sewall: The Lancet study relied on a door-to-door survey of Iraqi households in 33 neighborhoods. The surveyors asked for details of deaths in the months before and after the invasion and found a…
The news is bleak. I don't have a lot of confidence in the reported numbers. At one time it was said that on a nice Saturday in the summer, four out of five cars driving around in downtown Boston were looking for a parking place. This is somewhat like the situation in Liberia and possibly other…
MSNBC is reporting that, as of 7 am, over 200,000 people had taken the DC metro in to the city. The mall is so well filled that I'm having a hard time seeing any empty space between the capitol and the Washington Monument. I'm going to do some very conservative crowd size estimates right now. I'…

1. What is 'Torpig'?

2. What is a 'botnet'?

3. What is UCSB'?

4. What do 180,000 infections have to do with 8,000 bank accounts? What was infected, what was the infection?

The article looks rather interesting, and explains some of what you did not. But your 'blog-entry' would have benefited quite a bit from avoiding the obfuscation.

By oscar zozlaster (not verified) on 04 May 2009 #permalink

But your 'blog-entry' would have benefited quite a bit from avoiding the obfuscation.

Thank you. I'll try to spell everything out in the future. Wouldn't want you to either know something in advance or use the Internet to find out about stuff that you don't understand in a post.

Seriously. You do realize that you commented on a post you know nothing about, admitting that you know nothing about the content. There must be a bajillion posts just like this out there - your work is cut out for you if you're going to comment on them all. Better get cracking.


By John Lynch (not verified) on 04 May 2009 #permalink