Taking over Torpig

In early 2009, a bunch of folks at UCSB took over the Torpig botnet for ten days. In that time, they observed more that 180,000 infections and recorded over 70G of data that the botnet captured. During that time, over 8,000 accounts at financial institutions were "acquired".

The report is available online [pdf]

Tags

More like this

The Washington Post continues its sorry record on the Lancet study with this piece by Sarah Sewall: The Lancet study relied on a door-to-door survey of Iraqi households in 33 neighborhoods. The surveyors asked for details of deaths in the months before and after the invasion and found a…
MSNBC is reporting that, as of 7 am, over 200,000 people had taken the DC metro in to the city. The mall is so well filled that I'm having a hard time seeing any empty space between the capitol and the Washington Monument. I'm going to do some very conservative crowd size estimates right now. I'…
Now that is unfortunate: Japan's leading toilet maker Toto Ltd. is offering free repairs for 180,000 bidet toilets after wiring problems caused several to catch fire, the company said Monday. The electric bidet accessory of Toto's Z series caught fire in three separate incidents between March 2006…
It has just been reported that Lonesome George, the Galapagos Tortoise who was considered to be the last of is kind, has died. the last remaining tortoise of his kind and a conservation icon, died on Sunday of unknown causes, the Galapagos National Park said. He was thought to be about 100 years…

1. What is 'Torpig'?

2. What is a 'botnet'?

3. What is UCSB'?

4. What do 180,000 infections have to do with 8,000 bank accounts? What was infected, what was the infection?

The article looks rather interesting, and explains some of what you did not. But your 'blog-entry' would have benefited quite a bit from avoiding the obfuscation.

By oscar zozlaster (not verified) on 04 May 2009 #permalink

But your 'blog-entry' would have benefited quite a bit from avoiding the obfuscation.

Thank you. I'll try to spell everything out in the future. Wouldn't want you to either know something in advance or use the Internet to find out about stuff that you don't understand in a post.

Seriously. You do realize that you commented on a post you know nothing about, admitting that you know nothing about the content. There must be a bajillion posts just like this out there - your work is cut out for you if you're going to comment on them all. Better get cracking.

/snark

By John Lynch (not verified) on 04 May 2009 #permalink