Mark Chu-Carroll has done it so that you don't have to ... read the Dembski & Marks paper that I mentioned a few days back. Shorter MC-C: "Same old rubbish." Read his full verdict here.

**Update (5/11):** Dembski "responds" (and apparently cannot bring himself to actually name who makes the criticism) and Mark sets him straight.

- Log in to post comments

### More like this

Here is a list of Basic Concept posts in Mathematics.
Recently Added: Fractals by Karmen at Chaotic Utopia; Innumeracy by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
StatisticsNormal Distribution by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad MathMean, Median and Mode by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad…

SPECIAL NOTE:This page and its subordinate pages will no longer be updated. See the new page at my new blog for the live version, and change all your subscriptions. Thank you.
This is a list of the Basic Concepts posts being put up by Science Bloggers and others. It will be updated and put to the…

Here is a list of Basic Concept posts in Computer Science and Logic.
Recently Added: "Binary Search" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Logic" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Modal Logic" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Syntax and Semantics" by Mark Chu-Carroll…

A few days ago, Billy Dembski responded negatively to a review of Michael Behe's new book by my fellow ScienceBlogger Mark Chu-Carroll. In particular, Dembski questioned whether it was really a review, telling his readers to "Judge for yourself whether this deserves to be called a review." (It is…

The "A single protein is so complex it couldn't come together randomly" nonsense will never go away. It'll keep popping up, getting refuted, and then popping up again in a new form.