Mark Chu-Carroll has done it so that you don't have to ... read the Dembski & Marks paper that I mentioned a few days back. Shorter MC-C: "Same old rubbish." Read his full verdict here.
Update (5/11): Dembski "responds" (and apparently cannot bring himself to actually name who makes the criticism) and Mark sets him straight.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Apparently William Dembski, over at Uncommon Descent is *not* happy with my review of
Behe's new book. He pulls out a rather pathetic bit of faux outrage: "Are there any anti-ID writings that the Panda's Thumb won't endorse?"
The outrage really comes off badly. But what's Debski and his trained…
SPECIAL NOTE:This page and its subordinate pages will no longer be updated. See the new page at my new blog for the live version, and change all your subscriptions. Thank you.
This is a list of the Basic Concepts posts being put up by Science Bloggers and others. It will be updated and put to the…
Now, it's time for the final chapter in my "visits with old friends" series, which brings us
back to the Good Math/Bad Math all-time reader favorite crackpot: Mr. George Shollenberger.
Last time I mentioned George, a number of readers commented on the fact that it's cruel to pick on poor George,…
Here is a list of Basic Concept posts in Computer Science and Logic.
Recently Added: "Binary Search" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Logic" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Modal Logic" by Mark Chu-Carroll at Good Math, Bad Math
"Syntax and Semantics" by Mark Chu-Carroll…
The "A single protein is so complex it couldn't come together randomly" nonsense will never go away. It'll keep popping up, getting refuted, and then popping up again in a new form.