Organisms

Octopus maorum Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
The title gets the principal objection of any creationist out of the way: yes, this population of Podarcis sicula is still made up of lizards, but they're a different kind of lizard now. Evolution works. Here's the story: in 1971, scientists started an experiment. They took 5 male lizards and 5 female lizards of the species Podarcis sicula from a tiny Adriatic island called Pod Kopiste, 0.09km2, and they placed them on an even tinier island, Pod Mrcaru, 0.03km2, which was also inhabited by another lizard species, Podarcis melisellensis. Then a war broke out, the Croatian War of Independence…
Octopus abaculus Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Euprymna tasmanica Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Check it out: it's yet another transitional form, a 92 million year old snake with two hindlimbs. Cool! Just last week I was told that none of these things exist.
Nautilus pompilious and some chordate Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Thaumelodone gunteri Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Look! He's been plastinated and hung in a Paris museum! OK, that's not so bad — if anyone wants to plastinate me after I'm dead and string me up from the rafters, I won't mind. This next bit, though, is going too far: people are laughing at the giant squid's embarrassing little sexual accidents. Seriously, everyone looks ridiculous during sex and it's not unusual to have the occasional slip up … and we bipedal mammals can screw up in even more embarrassing ways. And to add ignorance to insult, the squid article even gets it wrong. But males get round their inferior size by being endowed with…
When Surinam Toads mate, the male fertilizes the eggs and rubs them onto the female's back, where they adhere…and the female's skin responds by swelling and enveloping the eggs. Then, a few months later, we get this lovely scene:
Octopus aspilosomatis Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
You know how people can be going along, minding their own business, and then they see some cute big-eyed puppy and they go "Awwwww," and their hearts melt, and then it's all a big sloppy mushfest? I felt that way the other day, as I was meandering down some obscure byways of the developmental biology literature, and discovered the dicyemid mesozoa … an obscure phylum which I vaguely recall hearing about before, but had never seriously examined. After reading a few papers, I have to say that these creatures are much more lovable then mere puppy dogs. Look at this and say "Awwwww!" Light…
Bolitaena pygmaea Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Heteroteuthis hawaiiensis Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Metasepia pfefferi Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
It's the Encyclopedia of Life. Let's hope it takes off.
Loligo opalescens Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
It's a baby, and it's cute, and it's marine. Do I need any other excuses to post this?
It means "devil toad," and it was a 10 pound monster that lived 70 million years ago, in what is now Madagascar. It's huge, and judging by its living cousins, was a voracious predator. If it were alive today, it would probably be eating your cats and puppies. In other words, this was an awesome toad, and I wish I had one for a pet. Here's what it looks like, with some very large extant toads for comparison. Beelzebufo ampinga, Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. (A) Skull reconstruction showing parts preserved (white areas, Left) and distribution of pit-and-ridge ornament (stippling, Right). (B…
Since I wrote about the wacky creationist who couldn't wrap his mind around the idea that plants and animals are related, and since I generally do a poor job of discussing that important kingdom of the plants (I admit it, I'm a metazoan bigot…but I do try to overcome my biases), I thought I'd briefly mention an older review by Elliot Meyerowitz that compares developmental processes in plants and animals. The main message is that developmental processes, the mechanisms that assemble the multicellular whole, are very different in the two groups and are non-homologous, but don't get confused:…