Welcome, Dr M. P. Taylor

As you'll know if you've already seen the announcement over at SV-POW!, my friend and co-author Mike P. Taylor successfully defended his Ph. D. yesterday: congratulations again, Mike. Mike's thesis was titled Aspects of the History, Anatomy, Taxonomy and Palaeobiology of Sauropod Dinosaurs: its contents (listed here) will soon see publication; indeed, some chapters are already published (Taylor & Naish 2007) or in press.

i-687112700d0030e93dbcdddee8275df4-Drs-Buffetaut-Taylor-Gale-handshake-29-4-2009.jpg

Here, Mike shakes hands with Eric Buffetaut (his external examiner) while a very jovial Andy Gale (his internal examiner; he looks suspiciously like Eddie Izzard in this shot) stands by. Unfortunately, notable absences meant that the post-viva celebrations were not as raucous as is usual, but we still had a fun time talking about Camelotia, Giraffatitan, the Archibishop, elongate trachea, taxonomic vandalism and choristoderes. Well done again, Mike, and welcome to the club!

Refs - -

Taylor, M. P. & Naish, D. 2007. An unusual new neosauropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Hastings Beds Group of East Sussex, England. Palaeontology 50, 1547-1564.

More like this

Steve Sweetman and I have just published a paper on a new maniraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wealden Supergroup of East Sussex, England (Naish & Sweetman 2011). As you might know if you're a regular reader, much of my technical work has been devoted to Wealden theropods…
By now you might have heard the thrilling news that Britain has a brand-new sauropod dinosaur: it's an animal that I've obliquely alluded to many times here at Tet Zoo (since February 2006 in fact), and its study and publication have been many months - in fact years - in the making. Yes, it's (…
[Note: Wow; apparently I hit a bit of a nerve, but that's a good thing. I hope the comments keep coming in. Like many of you mentioned I think Nature and Science are good "pop" journals that introduce new research to a wide audience over a wider range of topics, but I am often disappointed by how…
Ulf Bodin and his team at the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm have built a really, really sweet database and search interface for Hjalmar Stolpe's Birka graves. Between 1871 and 1895, Stolpe dug about 1100 graves in the cemeteries surrounding the Viking Period town of Birka on an…

Taxonomic vandalism? Sounds like fun!

Choristoderes? Sounds like the headache Zeus had when he was, uh, pregnant with Athena.

Congratulations anyway :-)

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

This is the thesis that was titled just "Sauropods", right? That provoked the enigmatic remark about Darren's legendary laziness? (And should have been titled "Long Necks, Short Tempers"?)

See http://svpow.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/darn/

By Nathan Myers (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

Great news, Mike, and congratulations (I know, that word must be ringing in your ears, but how sweet)! I'm really looking forward to reading your paper! --Mark

By Mark Hallett, … (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

Congrats! Too bad it didn't end up being titled "Sauropods" though...

BTW, what is "taxonomic vandalism"? I Googled it but understanding the hits seemed to require previous knowledge of the people and issues involved...

By William Miller (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

Thanks to all for your congratulations! Zach, Camelotia is a prosauropod; no hazing process, just a pleasant chat about sauropods; Nathan, yes, that's the one -- I ended up with the rather less memorable (but no more informative) title "Aspects of the history, anatomy, taxonomy and palaeobiology of sauropod dinosaurs"; Mark, the paper that (I think) you're referring to has been in press for seven months and will hopefully see the light of day pretty soon.

William: I won't say too much about "taxonomic vandalism" (which actually ought to be called "nomenclatural vandalism" but that doesn't have the same ring) because I know Darren's planning a TZ post on this subject. But to get a flavour, you might like to page your way through this post: http://forums.kingsnake.com/view.php?id=976924,976924

Camelotia a 'prosauropod'? Surely you jest :)

Seriously, in recent phylogenies it's a basal sauropod, closer to Eusauropoda than to taxa like Blikanasaurus and Antetonitrus (this is what I was saying to Eric when you came out of the pub).

All right, then, Mister Picky-Pants: Camelotia is one of those crappy super-basal "sauropods" that's so plesiomorphic it might just as well be a prosauropod. (Upchurch et al. 2007 recovered it in a weakly supported clade with Lessemsaurus and Melonorosaurus, which -- according to Adam's definition of Sauropoda, shortly to be enshrined in the Phylocode companion volume -- makes it a non-sauropod). Anyway, as everyone knows, the fun really starts when you get down inside Eusauropoda.

That's Dr Picky-Pants to you. Adam - you know, the guys who's phylogenetic definition we're going with - found it to be within Sauropoda in the Aliwalia paper.

Huh, crappy. Huh, basal. A PhD craves not these things.

Melanorosaurus.

<duck & cover>

<RUN>

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 01 May 2009 #permalink

Congrats Mike Taylor!

Ugh, Australian herpetology is such a mess, what with the antics of Wells & Wellington, and Ray Hoser. I still can't quite bring myself to accept using Broghammerus for the reticulated python...

My congratulations as well, for what its worth...

"Dr. Picky-pants" gave me the biggest smile I 've had
all week.

Forward, Into the past!

By Craig York (not verified) on 01 May 2009 #permalink