Sea Monsters, the CFI conference

i-8d874a9f2f9b1318009eb42f07023740-Naish-sea-full-of-monsters-Oct-2009.jpg

On November 7th 2009, the Centre For Inquiry in London is hosting a one-day event titled Monsters From the Deep! It's being held at Conway Hall in Red Lion Square (a venue I know all too well...). I'm giving a talk at the event so wanted to advertise it: for more details please visit the CFI website here. The day kicks off at 11am and will include both talk and workshop sessions. Charles Paxton of the University of St. Andrews, well known for his work on statistical ecology, will be giving a talk titled 'Anecdotes, statistics and sea monsters'. The belief that anecdotal data (in this case, reports of sea monsters) can be dismissed wholesale is naïve, as analysis can still reveal meaningful inferences (make sure you see Paxton (2009) for more on this). Charles will also be leading a workshop on 'Ecology of aquatic monsters'. A very belated congrats to Charles, incidentally, for his 2002 Ig Nobel Prize for Bubier et al. (1998).

I'll also be speaking, and will be discussing the 'prehistoric survivor paradigm' and what it does, or doesn't, mean for sea monster sightings. The hypothesis that sea monsters (if they exist) might be late-surviving plesiosaurs, basilosaurids and mosasaurs that have somehow managed to survive for tens of millions of years without leaving a fossil record is certainly not endorsed by all cryptozoologists, but it is still out there, is discussed in most of the more prominent literature on the subject, and is repeated every single time the media announces a new plesiosaur discovery, sigh. I'll be discussing the evidence from the fossil record, what we think we know about the biology and behaviour of plesiosaurs, basilosaurids and whatnot, and will be comparing all of this to what's reported in the sea monster literature. It's essentially a very updated version of 'Seals, serpents and coelacanths' (Naish 2001), incorporating stuff from Woodley et al. (2009) and various other projects.

i-184dcdc1f244c59ae37801bcacaaa739-Heuvelmans-sea-serpent-motley-Oct-2009.jpg

All in all, it's sure to be good fun. I hope to see you there!

For previous Tet Zoo articles on marine cryptids, or sea monsters, see...

Refs - -

Bubier, N. E., Paxton, C. G. M., Bowers, P. & Deeming, D. C. 1998. Courtship behaviour of ostriches (Struthio camelus) towards humans under farming conditions in Britain. British Poultry Science 39, 477-481.

Naish, D. 2001. Sea serpents, seals and coelacanths: an attempt at a holistic approach to the identity of large aquatic cryptids. In Simmons, I. & Quin, M. (eds) Fortean Studies Volume 7. John Brown Publishing (London), pp. 75-94.

Paxton, C. G. M. 2009. The plural of "anecdote" can be "data": statistical analysis of viewing distances in reports of unidentified giant marine animals 1758-2000. Journal of Zoology DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00630.x

Woodley, M. A., Naish, D. & Shanahan, H. P. 2009. How many extant pinniped species remain to be described? Historical Biology 20, 225-235.

More like this

This weekend (17th-18th April 2010), the 9th European Symposium of Cryptozoology is being held at Engreux in the south of Belgium. I meant to attend and give a talk, but had to cancel for financial reasons. And it's just as well that I did, given that virtually all flights from out of the UK have…
Like most scientific communities, the world of academic tetrapod zoology is an incestuous place. Inspired by a comment made here at Tet Zoo by Matt Wedel - co-author, colleague and one of the three SV-POWsketeers - Cameron McCormick (who works on guppies but is collaborating with Michael Woodley…
By complete coincidence - honestly! - we looked yesterday at discovery rates among terrestrial mammals. All indications are that many species remain to be discovered. It should also be well known, and I hope it is, that the same is true for large marine vertebrates: recent discoveries, and…
On July 12th 2011 a very interesting thing is happening - interesting, that is, if you're interested in the academic evaluation of cryptozoological data. ZSL (the Zoological Society of London) is hosting the meeting 'Cryptozoology: science or pseudoscience?'. Speakers are Charles Paxton, Michael…

Is everything in the first pic to scale�!? Because that would give us a five-meter-long coelacanth. That would be way too cool.

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Today`s Sea Monsters are Giant Squids, Octopuses and the Great White.Monsters of the abyss exist, but they are small in size but weird to the extreme.

By Bob Michaels (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Darren,

I'm sure it's been asked before (perhaps by me!), but is there anything out there that does for ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs and/or mosasaurs what 'The Pterosaurs: From Deep Time' does for pterosaurs? Or will that be your next book? :-)

I'm enjoying the dino discoveries book very much, BTW.

By Mike from Ottawa (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Richard Ellis wrote a great book about marine reptiles several years ago. I can't remember what it's called now. Something like "Sea Dragons," I think.

David, ever heard of Mawsonia? A coelacanth the size of a great white shark is really amazing, even if it is not among modern sightings of cryptids, but a beast which has really existed.

My eyes are getting old. I had to look at the picture two
or three times before I even spotted the Coelocanth...
Sounds like a enjoyable event-wish I could attend.

By Craig York (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

ID's of the critters in the first pic would be nice. What's that thing on the bottom next to the octopus?

oooooooowwwwwwwwwwww!
If only it wasn't in london i would go, living in bolton and bein 14 is so rubish!

By Zach hawkins (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Yes, yes, I've read about Mawsonia and Megalocoelacanthus. But the slightest rumor of an extant coelacanth anywhere near that size would be... exciting. :-)

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Where can I find a larger version of that first image? I would almost like to have it as a poster in my room!

By Kevin Schreck (not verified) on 30 Oct 2009 #permalink

Kevin, I'll send you a larger version. It was originally designed to be a mural on my bedroom wall (sadly, it got papered over). Maybe I should get it printed out as a poster, 2 m tall.

Soryy to go off-topic but today i got a book cataloge listing book's for children about fossil's, your new book, the great dinosaur discoveries was there, but aparrently you've changed your name to Darren Nalsh!

By Zach Hawkins (not verified) on 01 Nov 2009 #permalink

Which sea monster in that picture represents the rhinoceros floating upside-down with a stick of French bread sticking out of its mouth with a small tortoise balanced on the end?

I like the inclusion of a living trunko in there :D

Also, what is that huge blue shark?

By Tim Morris (not verified) on 02 Nov 2009 #permalink

Just a blue shark that is â like most of the rest â not to scale?

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 03 Nov 2009 #permalink

While not a monsterous thing, is there a sea-ape in that menagerie?
And, out of curiousity, have there been found fossils of coelecanths that are more recent than the KT extinction? I presume there are but I keep running into the story that the most recent one in the fossil record is from 70mya.

have there been found fossils of coelecanths that are more recent than the KT extinction?

No â fossils aren't easy to find on the ocean floor.

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 03 Nov 2009 #permalink

The following comment was posted here back in January 2008 (here)...

------------------------

A Palaeocene fossil from Sweden and an unnamed taxon from the Miocene of Israel have been published (Ãrvig 1986, Goldsmith & Yanai-Inbar 1997). Having said that... I've asked around and nobody seems to know anything further about the coelacanth from Israel (the authors said that it was particularly close to Latimeria. Their use of the term 'coelacanthid' is worrying; there's no such name). Indeed a coelacanth paper from last year didn't mention it when referring to the youngest known coelacanths in the fossil record.

Refs - -

Goldsmith, N. F. & Yanai-Inbar, I. 1997. Coelacanthid in Israel's Early Miocene? Latimeria tests Schaeffer's theory. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17 (supp. 3), 49A.

Ãrvig, T. 1986. A vertebrate bone from the Swedish Paleocene. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 108, 139-141.

There have been sightings of a possible plesiosaur in the Congoâs of Africa. It might be possible that these creatures somehow survived, but that would mean more than 1 had survived.

Because that would give us a five-meter-long coelacanth.

I'm more worried by the 25 m green spermatozoön on the left - where did that come from?

So that's where THAT 25m green spermatozoon came from. Ordinary 3 meter spermatozoa, color unspecified, on the other hand...

In discussing Placoderms on Palaeos.com, Toby white suggests that they might have had a somewhat spermatozoon-like body form:
"The posterior of placoderms, where known, is thinner than expected for the equivalent osteichthyan or shark and generally scale-less, although there are exceptions. Quite likely this was because its principal function was to exert motive power -- more along the lines of a gigantic flagellum than an extension of the body cavity as such. Undoubtedly, it made better sense to attach the internal organs to the reinforced exoskeleton, near the center of gravity and of rotation, rather than dispersing them along the trunk in the manner of modern fish or tetrapods."

(And wouldn't be neat if there were extant Placoderms: it would make the gap in the Coelacanth fossil record seem trivial by comparison!)

By Allen Hazen (not verified) on 06 Nov 2009 #permalink

Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see a couple of orms in the top picture there?

By BunjyWunjy (not verified) on 09 Nov 2009 #permalink