If this is success, I don't know how they'd recognize failure

i-62753180a13578b44ace5b0c57fe3fc6-icas0307.jpgThe Discovery Institute says:

Even with more forward operations by US troops in the past month, and even though the full complement of added US forces has not been attained yet, the number of US fatalities is down. In other words, the Surge is working.

It's true that the number of fatalities is lower, but not nearly as much lower as they seem to believe. The source they cite looks at raw numbers of fatalities from time periods of different lengths, rather than the averaged values plotted above. As you can see, this is the first month since August that falls below the linear regression line. You would get an observation this far or farther from the regression line 70% of the time, so claiming that this month's numbers represent some sort of massive change is a little silly.

More like this

Salon observes: Sens. Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts have written a letter to the Department of Veterans Affairs urging full funding for a new cemetery at Fort Riley in Kansas. The reason: With an influx of casualties from Iraq, the existing cemetery at Fort Riley is now full. Well, not entirely…
Mr. Speaker! The Preznit of the Untied States of America. Congresscritters, esteemed Cabinet members and other besuited Washingtonians, I stand before you to tell you that the state of the union is … tolerable. After all, there'll be an election in November, and then it'll all be someone else's…
Over at Hullabaloo, Tristero is confused by Michael Gordon's claim that the surge has lowered the violence in Iraq: What I'd like to know, instead, is whether the conclusions he draws in the paragraph quoted are reasonable ones based upon the evidence he presents. Likewise, I'm aware of the "…
Last time I commented on Lott's claims about the Baghdad murder rate, I noted his pathological refusal to admit that he was wrong about the rate. Even though dozens of newspapers have reported that there are hundreds of murders each month in Baghdad (see the table with some of…

No fair, you are using that evil Arab algebra.

Surely the DI can't be arguing that the Iraq war policy is the result of intelligent design. Or maybe they can; after all, if the human body is the result of intelligent design, the Iraq policy certainly could be, too. All we need to do is redefine "intelligent."

Creationism is just one part of the DI's brilliant plan. They are out to promote a range of conservative policies.

All we need to do is redefine "intelligent."

Like this, Mark? (O'Leary alert!) "It's a failure, but it's still a designed failure."

I guess that sums up Iraq, too.