Obama endorsed by Moveon.org

70% of voters in MoveOn.org's membership poll backed Barack Obama. This clears the 2/3 threshold needed in order for the group to issue its first primary campaign endorsement ever. "A few weeks ago," MoveOn writes, "MoveOn members we surveyed were split. But with John Edwards bowing out, progressives are coming together. Obama won over 70% of the vote yesterday, and he's moving up in polls nationwide."

MoveOn was founded in the Clinton years as an effort to find a middle ground in the impeachment imbroglio. They called on Congress to drop the impeachment, to censure the President, and then to "move on."

Since that moderate start, they have been portrayed as ultraliberal for their advocacy against the war in Iraq and against the excesses of the Bush administration. Those positions are shared by a majority of Americans, Republicans and Democrats alike, so they could only be understood as "liberal" positions if we are prepared to accept that racist loon Ron Paul is more liberal than erstwhile freedom rider Joe Lieberman (to choose an example at random).

Nevertheless, this is significant for several reasons. First, it suggests that John Edwards's activists are largely breaking for Obama. A recent poll found that, nationally, "When asked for whom they would vote if their first choice dropped out, slightly more Edwards voters leaned toward Clinton than toward Obama." But the people who are on MoveOn's list are more likely to be out canvassing, putting up yard signs and convincing other Edwards voters to move towards Obama. By Tuesday, those opinion-makers could change a lot of minds.

Here's hoping. Obama is a lot closer to Edwards on key issues than Hillary ever was.

More like this

Below the fold is the press release (somewhat shortened). The numbers fell out at about 70-30. In a resounding vote today, MoveOn.org Political Action's members nationwide voted to endorse Senator Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for President. The group, with 3.2 million members…
I am utterly undecided. Feel free to make a suggestion. To me, it is simply not the case that in most regards one candidate has better positions than the other. The main difference I see is in that Clinton has articulated her positions in more detail than Obama. Obama seems to be running more of…
Back when I was at Texas A&M University, I knew plenty of Democrats who would vote in the Republican primary instead of the Democratic one. Although I refrained from such activity, their rationale was totally reasonable: in such a conservative area, the real contest was almost always the…
The Washington Post digs in an finds interesting parallels: Sen. Barack Obama offers himself as a post-partisan uniter who will solve the country's problems by reaching across the aisle and beyond the framework of liberal and conservative labels he rejects as useless and outdated. But as Obama…

Move On fails to mention the number of members who didn't vote because their candidate was left off the ballot, no one in the media has pointed it out. So what does it say about people like myself who when given only two candidates to choose from- Hillary and Barack didn't vote at all. I was so upset that Move On came out with this poll two days after John Edwards suppended his campaign, I unsubscribed to their email notices. I had contributed $25 to Move On only days earlier. This was callus on their part.

By Katherine (not verified) on 02 Feb 2008 #permalink

I don't know the number of votes cast, but clearly a lot of Edwards votes moved to Obama, if the vote was split last time. I wish Edwards were still in the race, and I'd surely rather have it be down to Edwards and Obama. But the voters in several states spoke, and Edwards dropped out. MoveOn doesn't seem callous, it just seems to be honoring events on the ground.