Schrock explains the meaning of Christmas in schools

In the Wichita Eagle, we get Santa Claus and the Establishment Clause:

This time of year, every public school administrator has to know a simple fragment of Constitutional law. It has many implications in the school setting during the holiday season. "Jingle Bells" is OK. Christmas hymns with denominational themes are not.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." is part of the First Amendment. This segment is called the "Establishment Clause" because it prevents the government and all of its federal, state and local agencies from "establishing" or otherwise becoming entangled in promoting or prohibiting religion.

Though we are a democracy, or more precisely a representative republic, a majority with one religious belief cannot use a government agency -- in this case, a public school -- to impose their religion upon a student.

My student teachers cannot pass my methods course without being able to write out this Establishment Clause letter-perfect from memory. And they all do. I have this absolute requirement because this clause is the foundation for understanding how to handle lessons when teaching science concepts that may contradict particular religious beliefs.

The science teachers I train are not concerned with Christmas carols, but with families that dispute the benefits of blood transfusions, the value of vaccinations, the need for sex education, the concept of evolution and many other science lessons.

Science teachers in American public schools teach science, not religion. In 1999, when the first of the recent dustups occurred over evolution in the Kansas Science Education Standards, I communicated with the well-known Oxford professor Richard Dawkins and published his response to the "Alabama insert," a textbook disclaimer that had to be pasted inside every biology textbook in that state (a requirement that was later overthrown). In e-mail, Dawkins suggested that U.S. teachers should just invite opposing clergy into the science classroom for a debate on evolution versus religion. We cannot do that.

England had a state church. We had a Revolutionary War. We now have the Establishment Clause.

In science and other disciplines, American teachers ask students for "understanding." We do not compel "belief."

If parents do not want their student exposed to ideas that are not in agreement with their religion, Kansas is one of many states that has a religious opt-out.

Recent world events should cause us to appreciate our Establishment Clause and the way it has established our climate of tolerance. Some theocracies in the Middle East require all women, regardless of belief, to wear head scarves. To the other extreme, France -- also without our Establishment Clause -- bans such head scarves for university students.

Yes, Virginia, there is an Establishment Clause. If you want to believe in Santa Claus, or wear a head scarf tomorrow -- that is your choice, too.

John Richard Schrock trains biology teachers and lives in Emporia.

Too good not to reprint in full.


More like this

Video is not Christine O'Donnell's friend — every time she opens her mouth she exposes her ugly, ignorant side. The latest faux pas comes from here performance in a debate with her opponent in which she reveals she hasn't read the first amendment, and is surprised by what's in it. Here's the…
The WorldNutDaily is reporting on a Federal court case involving Palm Beach, Florida, where they allowed a Jewish menorrah to be displayed in a public park, but refused to allow a Christian nativity scene. Both were paid for with private funds. The city was obviously wrong to do so and they have…
Marci Hamilton has an interesting column on Findlaw about whether the Establishment Clause is incorporated by the 14th amendment, which means whether it now applies to the states or not. The Supreme Court has long held that it does, but at least one justice, Clarence Thomas, argues that it does not…
In a posting last week, I discussed a challenge that has been made by Joseph Mastrapaolo to pretty much everyone he can find who defends evolution. After sending out this challenge and getting no response from scientists who have better things to do with their time than play JoMo's absurd little…