Eugenie Scott, etc.

They're inviting special people to jump in line.

Genie is being invited to testify. Youtube shortly.

Now some guy is saying that everyone who defends evolution is an evil atheist.

And the next guy is a Paluxy track apologist. Honestly.

More like this

Dembski has responded - kind of - yet again. He's seen my previous post and noted my statement that Shallit's deposition is included as an appendix in the plaintiff's response to the defense motion for summary judgement. He writes: Ed Brayton at http://www.stcynic.com/blog/archives/2005/11/…
Some dude who cut in line, science prof.: Keep the language unchanged. How many conformists got patents or Nobel Prizes? Key element of college readiness is crit. thinking. Quote Nietzsche, to no clear end. Campbell and Reece disparages anything but evolution. C&R is a college text. Leo:…
Shorter Jerry Coyne: Wanting gnu atheists not to be dickbags is the equivalent of telling them to STFU. Jeremy Stangroom's claim that gnus use ad hominem attacks is wrong because, look, he tried to defend a 28 year-old woman having sex with a 14 year-old boy. If you need further proof that I'm…
PZ is unamused. I criticized his criticism of prayer vigils in the Gulf, and he responds: It's strange how the people who most advocate sympathy and rapprochement with religion are blind to what religious people really think. Here's another case where Josh Rosenau complains that I misunderstand…

They need to borrow the argument from oranges from the Florida hearings.

Euginie was awesome, the problem is that testimonies like her's, as pointed and clear as it can be, are not making as much an impact as the lawyers who are completely polished in "smooth talking" and open debate are. Those are the S&W proponents who are nit-picking over each word as a legal liability for the state.