Newt Gingrich should not be allowed in polite company

This is his actual argument against allowing the Senate to pass healthcare reform by a simple majority:

the United States is not going to tolerate a group of people trying apply kind of a Hugo Chavez majoritarian rule

Is that why we hate Hugo Chavez now? Because of his profound commitment to majoritarian rule? Yes, that must be why conservatives dislike him.

More like this

Here's a prominent Democratic congressman commenting on the effect of the Massachusetts Senate race on health care reform: I have two reactions to the election in Massachusetts. One, I am disappointed. Two, I feel strongly that the Democratic majority in Congress must respect the process and make…
Sandy Levinson makes a good case that Wednesday is the acid test for the Obama administration's commitment to "Change We Can Believe In." On Wednesday, the President of the Senate, Vice-President Joe Biden, will be asked to rule that the Senate is a non-continuing body, which he will do if he has…
Christopher Ortiz, editor of the reconstructionist journal Faith for All of Life and communications director for the Chalcedon Foundation, has authored a weakly reasoned defense of reconstructionism. In it, he takes on critics like Chip Berlet and Frederick Clarkson. Ortiz seems to miss completely…
There were lots of reasons why I wanted to see Affordable Care (née healthcare reform) pass. Ending the tyranny of "pre-existing conditions," of cruel recissions, and insuring more than 30 million uninsured Americans were big reasons. But it wasn't a perfect bill, and there was a vocal group of…

Perhaps Newt is still upset that those lousy majoritarians in the House defeated his Contract on America.