Don’t be fooled by the safety talk

I often find myself trying to reconcile a company’s description of its safety program with what I hear from workers. One worker I met summed it up this way:

“Yeah, we have safety talks, but a talk is where it ends. It’s all talk, not real action on safety problems.”

Two recent incidents brought his remark back to life for me. It started with a recent news release from OSHA. The agency announced a proposed penalty of $50,600 to Grede Wisconsin Subsidiaries LLC at the firm’s Browntown, Wisconsin iron foundry. Funny thing is, the firm was touting its safety record last month at OSHA’s public hearing on its proposed silica regulation.

In its comments to the agency, Grede said

“safety is the top priority, with environmental, health and industry-leading safety policies and safety metrics that are best in class.”

Yet with “safety as a top priority” they didn’t offer a single provision of OSHA’s proposed regulation that they would support. And their OSHA inspection history also tells a different story. In just the two last years, the firm has received citations for five repeat and 31 serious violations at its foundries in Biscoe, NC; Berlin, WI; Browntown, WI; Columbiana, Alabama; Kingsford, MI; Omaha, Nebraska; and Radford, Virginia. One inspection at the Browntown foundry resulted in citations for 17 serious and three repeat violations. OSHA proposed a penalty of $274,500 which was settled by the company for $133,000. Just a few weeks ago, came the citations for one repeat and two serious violations, and the proposed penalty of $50,600. Their “safety is a top priority” talk sounds to me like it's just talk.

The second incident comes courtesy of the American Meat Institute. It’s the trade association for U.S. packers and processors of meat and poultry industry. AMI announced this week the recipients of its awards for “high levels of worker safety performance.” AMI chairman and president and CEO of American Foods Group, Greg Benedict, said:

“Worker safety progress is one of our industry’s greatest success stories. During the last 19 years, injury/illness rates in the US meat industry have improved by nearly 80 percent. The rate of injury and illness in the meat and poultry industry continues to fall — and this is no accident.”

Let’s have a reality check. Both the meat and poultry industry are listed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as those with the highest reported rates of injuries that require a worker to be on restricted duty or transferred from their regular work tasks. Out of 1,066 six-digit NAICS industry codes, both meat and poultry are on that illustrious list of just 17 industries. At one poultry plant which was recently evaluated by NIOSH, the researchers reported alarming results: forty-two percent of the workers (n=318) had physiological evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome. 42 percent! That’s no success story.

It's true in foundries, in meat packing, poultry processing and every other industry. Firms will tout their safety records, but when a light is shown on them, we see a different story. It is, as the worker said, just safety talk.

 

More like this

OSHA’s list of bad actors has two new members. I just happened upon an updated list on the agency’s website of the employers OSHA designates as "severe violators." It indicates the two companies were added in the four weeks following President Trump’s inauguration. The list is dated April 7, 2017.…
Our regular readers are well aware of the hazards faced by workers in the US poultry industry (as well as related industries processing other meats), and of the USDA's misguided poultry-inspection proposal that would allow for increased line speeds in US poultry plants. Workers, public-health…
While we’re on vacation, we’re re-posting content from earlier in the year. This post was originally published on May 31, 2012. By Celeste Monforton The Obama Administration’s quest to appease business interests’ claims about burdensome and outdated regulations awoke a giant in the form of the…
OSHA proposed serious and repeat violations yesterday to Wayne Farms for a variety of safety hazards, including those that led to musculoskeletal injuries among the company’s poultry processing workers. By my calculation, it was the first time in more than a decade that the Labor Department used…

The same has been true in almost all underground coal mines in Kentucky for the past 35 years. Countless miners will tell you that "safety talks" are regularly held outside, but once the shift starts underground unsafe practices abound and miners know that the "safety talk" was just a bunch of b.s. The National Mining Association and the Kentucky Coal Association have bragged for years that safety is their #1 priority, but they have fought like hell against every safety & health regulation that's been proposed in the past 35 years. Ironically, however, whenever the death and injury rates drop - because of common sense safety advances like canopies on mobile equipment, automated temporary roof support systems, methane monitors, etc., all of which were bitterly opposed by industry - then the industry big shots try to take credit for the improved rates. The coal operators and their lobbyists act like it was their initiative and their commitment to safety that lowered the rates when, in fact, they had to be drug - kicking and screaming - to go along with basic safety advances. Bottom line: the industry lobbyists for the past 35 years have been a bunch of well-compensated hypocrites who could care less about health and safety.

By Tony Oppegard (not verified) on 18 Apr 2014 #permalink

Well said Tony!!! Safety to these Pathetic Operations , is simply a false front that they put on to try to justify themselves when something goes wrong. It's premeditated, they push production so hard and at any cost, not worried about the safey of the men , its bound to happen

By Reuben Shemwell (not verified) on 19 Apr 2014 #permalink