Privacy and Law: Recent German High Court Ruling

An important ruling on data retention by German Federal court that sets the politicians and beaurocrats straight.

Germany's highest court on Tuesday overturned a law allowing authorities to retain data on telephone calls and e-mail traffic to help fight terrorism and crime. The Federal Constitution Court ruled that major changes needed to be made to a 2008 law ordering data on calls made from mobile or fixed-line telephones and e-mail traffic to be kept for six months for possible access by law enforcement agencies.

The judges said the data storage was not secure enough and that it was not sufficiently clear what it would be used for. A record number of almost 35,000 people, including current Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, had originally brought the case to the court. The law stems from a European Union directive.

Here's in UK, privacy is and has been going down the drain. Gordon Brown wants more CCTV and bigger databases. The sad thing: I think he has convinced himself that these measures help. There is no theater like security theater. It keeps us unprofitably but happily occupied, like frogs taking a sauna in a kettle.

More like this

The Supreme Court today refused to hear a case asking them to overturn the Massachusetts State Supreme Court decision on gay marriage.
I don't know what the deal is with Alabama judges, but Tom Parker of the Alabama Supreme Court seems to want to follow in Roy Moore's footsteps.
Time Pawlenty has become famous for his ability to be extraordinarily vague. Now we are seeing this in relation to the expected Minnesota State Supreme Court decision on the Franken-Coleman Senate election contest.
One of the most frightening trends of the last few years is the alarming increase in anti-judicial rhetoric from the right. The courts, of course, are a convenient whipping boy for politicians who have to manipulate the populace to get elected to office.