Cali Cars and CO2

OK I'm back from the west coast where we visited friends, family and the desert. My laptop has been resurrected and NO MORE RERUNS, I promise. Also I've seen that trackback spam has evolved (well perhaps intelligently evolved is closer to the truth).

Northern California was great (although in the past few weeks a bit wet). If I had sum up southern California in a word it would be "car", but in reality L.A. is quite elusive and massive. After parading around LA for a couple of days we saw a great documentary at the Egyptian, called L.A. Plays Itself. It's a tad on the long side, but for anyone who lives in the area, or is interested in how art and history interact to invoke a certain view point of a city as complex as Los Angeles, it's worth a look.

Speaking of cars, the weather etc., check out this Carbon Footprint quiz over at WIRED. How many pounds of CO2 do I release every year?

My total is about 17000-18000 pounds. That's pretty good according to their scale.

My total is low because,
1) I live in an apartment building. In general apartment buildings are much more fuel efficient that houses due to the fact that the surface/volume ratio is lower, resulting in less heat loss in the winter and less heat gain in the summer (i.e. lower energy consumption for heating and AC). I must say that our building is old (built in 1872) and is not as well insulated as more modern apartment buildings. This may raise my real numbers.
2) I have no car and use public transport. This is the major reason my CO2 numbers are so low.
3) We use the bus to travel to NYC and Montreal. Just like public transport, Greyhound and the Chinatown express are also quite fuel efficient. A major use of CO2 is air travel. I take about 2 transcontinental flights a year, my wife less. This is a major chunk of our CO2 emission. This year we may take 3 flights raising each of our totals by ~6000 pounds.

According to the WIRED scale, I'm almost Deep Green. So basically living in a crowded city is generally greener than living in a car city such as LA. I've actually heard this argument before in David Korten's provocative book, When Corporations rule the World.

One way I could improve my CO2 numbers, is to buy more local produce. I didn't know this but a big chunk of our energy consumption goes into the transport of goods such as food. A second way would be to travel less, as in fewer air flights - that would be hard. A third way would be to move to a modern apartment building.

I better end it here. Pics of Cali will follow soon.

Tags

More like this

The latest Wired features a list of contrarian environmental facts (organically raised cattle emit more methane gas than conventionally raised cattle, nuclear power is great, the Prius battery takes a lot of energy to make, etc.) but I was most surprised by this factoid: Cooling a home in Arizona…
I recently posted a simple Internet meme suggesting that if we subsidized solar energy like we subsidized fossil fuels that this could be good. I posted that on Google Plus an it engendered way over 300 comments, many of which attempted to explain, often rather impolitely, that solar energy was…
For a Swede, I believe I have an unusually small environmental footprint as my income is low and my habits relatively ascetic. But compared to most people in the world, anyone with half my standard of living is of course a huge culprit. The only thing I might brag about is having relatively few…
In light of the nuclear power plant partial meltdowns in Japan, there are calls for not expanding the U.S. nuclear power plant capacity, and even shutting down existing plants. What bothers me about this is that there is no discussion of how we make up the energy production shortfall--I'll get to…

Neat to look at - but the Air travel numbers are somehow out of wack. There is a 10x increase from a 600 mile roundtrip to a 1000 mile roundtrip! They may be trying to distinguish between a small plane and a larger jet but I have seen the mileage per person and the larger jets are at least as economical. Thus the CO2 should be proportional to distance and it isn't.

Because of this 15% of my CO2 for just ONE round trip on 1000 miles it has to be skewing everything and makes me wonder about the validity of the rest of the numbers. Man I can buy an SUV to replace my little Taurus and just just one less plane trip to make up the difference and more?

I suppose it is interesting, and might at least make you think. But what about wood-burning for heat? No net CO2 gain. What about a car that gets 48 mpg? What does "electric" heat mean? Resistance heating or a heat pump? What about heating with electricity in the northwest, where lots of hydro power is available? I note that riding a motorcycle is rated close to using an interstate bus, but most motorcycles sold today do not get especially good mileage. A good touring bike might get 35 to 50, depending on which bike. With one person on the bike, it doesn't take many passengers on a bus to get much better fuel efficiency, and CO2 emission is directly related to fuel use.

By Mark Paris (not verified) on 03 May 2006 #permalink

Nice to see that your back.

By Acme Scientist (not verified) on 03 May 2006 #permalink

Air travel numbers are somehow out of wack. There is a 10x increase from a 600 mile roundtrip to a 1000 mile roundtrip!

I think you misread the article Markk - that's a 6000-8000 mile roundtrip, not a 1000 mile roundtrip.

And about the consumption of gas by air travel - yeah I was surprised too, but it's about the same fuel consumption as if you were to take the trip by car (about 1 pound per mile).

Yup mine is low too. No car = lots of CO2 savings.

By Acme Scientist (not verified) on 07 May 2006 #permalink