FASEB: Urge Congress to Support the NIH and NSF

From the Federation of American Scientists for Experimental Biology (for all you non-biologists who are wondering who FASEB is):

Urge Congress to Support Research
Increase for NIH and NSF Depends On It!

ACTION REQUIRED NOW! The 2 Most Important Weeks for NIH and NSF Funding in FY2008

Dear FASEB Society Members:

The next two weeks are the most important for determining the level of appropriations that can be attained in FY2008 for the research agencies we support (NIH, NSF, DOE, VA, USDA and NASA).

The Budget Committees are meeting this week to finalize the level of discretionary spending that appropriations committee members will have available to allocate among the many discretionary programs, including NIH, NSF DOE, VA, USDA and NASA. In addition, once the appropriations committees are provided with a total discretionary number, the House and Senate Appropriations Committee Chairmen, David Obey (D-WI) and Robert Byrd (D-WV), respectively, will immediately provide allocations to the twelve appropriations subcommittees.

As you know, FASEB and the broader research community have been advocating for a 6.7% increase for NIH in FY2008. However, the only way this goal can possibly be attained is by ensuring that the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations subcommittee receives an allocation increase (over FY2007) of something close to $14 billion.

Therefore, please send the following e-mail to your respective House and Senate Members urging them to support the Congressional budget proposal to provide an additional $22 billion for discretionary spending (over what the President proposed in his FY2008 budget), and request that they encourage Appropriations Committee Chairmen Obey and Byrd to provide a $14 billion increase to the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations subcommittee in FY2008. These increases will allow for a 6.7% increase in NIH's budget in FY2008.

Click here to take action and sign the online petition.

Tags

More like this

The non-deterministic blog has posted a roundup of our responses to their question about justifying science funding to the public. On a related note, I recently received an update on the status of funding for biomedical research in the United States. In my last report, I pointed out that the House…
The Specter-Harkin Amendment passed the Senate, but this does not guarantee an increase to the NIH budged. The House must still vote on it and it must be reflected in House and Senate Appropriations Committees' allocation for the Labor-Health and Human Services Appropriations Committee. (Don't…
I just couldn't believe it ... read the confession here. Yeah I know ... crazy. But now that I have your attention, click here to contact your house representative to tell him/her to support the NIH by increasing funding in the new House budget resolution. What is the NIH? ... the National…
We're pleased to repost the latest email from ScienceDebate: Dear Friend, Last Friday you and others in the science community took action and helped to restore $3.1 billion in cuts to science that had been planned in the Senate compromise version of the stimulus bill. That was a good victory for U…

I yearn for the day when the NIH and NSF can set their own budget and scientific inquiry is a top governmental priority. Of course, until then, we'll just have to keep electronically signing documents that end up in a lowly staffer's junk mailbox.