Tid Bits

It has been a while. Here goes:i-a23287276fc711a5364ee5c6ea6b6a45-Darwinonline.jpg

'Do you want to catch up on your Darwin?
Here's a link to the Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online.

Want something to listen to while you are stuck in traffic? How about the audio version of The Origin of Species.

Also there is a great podcast from the Whitehead - I've been wanting to write about this for a while - go check it out.

And there is the Science Saturdays at Bloggerheads.tv that I've mentioned previously.

What else is there ...

Via Hsien at Eye on DNA I stumbled onto this clip produced by Genome British Columbia's Learning Centre:

... uhm ... I guess that is what you call public-reach-out?

Dan at Migrations has a great weekly summary of the webs best Cell Biology blogging called Cells Weekly.

In the "how to measure an academic" category, here is something from RPM at evolgen:

Paul Erdos was an extremely prolific and mobile mathematician who has left a legacy in academia in the form of the Erdos Number -- a count of your "academic distance" from Erdos. Anyone who published a paper with Erdos has an Erdos number of one (Erdos, himself, had a number of zero), people who published with anyone with an Erdos number of one have an Erdos number of two, and so on. It's a point of pride for a mathematician or other researcher to have a small Erdos number.

RPM proposes a Gibbs number for biologists. That is horrible. Maybe for genomics types, but for all biologists? How about a Watson/Crick number instead?

Now as for real Science blogging, here is something refreshing from suicyte:

I plan to do an experiment in science blogging. As my may have noticed, an earlier post on this blog addresses a series of recent papers identifying markers with strong association to both myocardial infarction risk and type 2 diabetes. Both markers map to a narrow region on 9p21.3. In an interview, Francis Collins compared this region to the 'soul of the genome', which many people thought was kind of funny.

Nevertheless, there is little doubt that something interesting is going on in this part of the genome. Since I am a generally curious person, I am going to have a closer look at 9p21.3, and I am sure that many other people will do so. Unlike the others, I am going to describe my work, ideas and results in a series of blog posts, here on Suicyte Notes. If anybody else wants to contribute, be my guest.

I will be attending a conference during the next few days,, but when I am back in the office, I will start right away. Expect the first post on this subject early next week. So long.

Great! I can't wait to see what happens. That reminds me that a recent study by DeCode and others have found that mutations in two RNA binding proteins are associated with type II diabetes - I promise to blog about this in the near future.

Then Coturnix blogs (and links) to those going to the upcoming Science Foo Camp. I was also invited ... because of my paper and NERD club I've just been too busy to think about such things, but it now looks like I will attend.

Tags

More like this

I have a favour to ask of all of you. Go and fill in SciLink's Tree of Science (you'll have to sign up to SciLink first). Why? Well it is very interesting to see how different scientists are connected. And on top of that we can settle a longstanding dispute - what is the appropriate Erdos Number…
Paul Erdos was an extremely prolific and mobile mathematician who has left a legacy in academia in the form of the Erdos Number -- a count of your "academic distance" from Erdos. Anyone who published a paper with Erdos has an Erdos number of one (Erdos, himself, had a number of zero), people who…
I'll be uploading a few of what I saw as the highlights from the AGBT meeting over the next week or so, as I go over my notes - you can also browse over Anthony Fejes' blog for live-blogging of many of the sessions. In no particular order, here are some of the tid-bits gleaned from Friday's…
Welcome to the 15th edition of Mendel's Garden. This month Gregor wanted to compile a summer reading list for all those going to the beach. But watch out, a sandy keyboard is never good! So here we go: First off, Gregor would like to point out this very interestin peice on what exactly caused…

Even Watson/Crick are representing just one narrow part of biology - how many ecologists, physiologists, ethologists, evolutionary theorists, epidemiologists, etc. would have any connection to them? I think (almost?) anyone publishing later than Darwin is already too specialized to connect to all of biology.