Here we are going to look at the best available figures for offshore drilling, specifically the areas that are currently off-limits. That's what the fight is about.
First, how much oil we consume and how much we "produce":
The bottom line is that we consume a heck-of-a-lot more, close to twice what we currently produce.
And how much more could we get "offshore" from areas that are currently off-limits? Well if you comb all the literature out there, the simple answer is that we don't really know. Here's the closest that I've been able to get from an article in Scientific American:
The Minerals Management Service (MMS), part of the U.S. Department of the Interior responsible for leasing tracts to oil and gas companies and collecting the royalties on them ... has estimated that there are around 18 billion barrels in the underwater areas now off-limits to drilling. That's significantly less than in oil fields open for business in the Gulf of Mexico, coastal Alaska and off the coast of southern California, where there are 10.1 billion barrels of known oil reserves as well as an estimated 85.9 billion more.
So the whole fight is for 18 billion barrels (as far as we know). To place this figure into context, the current estimated reserves for the US (excluding all offshore) is about 22 billion barrels. Add 96 billion barrels from the current offshore drilling areas (total now up to 118 billion barrels) and those 18 billion barrels don't seem like so much. Let's look at the world's oil reserves and consumption rates and compare all these numbers:
*Decade numbers = Per Year figures x 10
Note that by 2030, oil consumption is estimated to go way up due in large part to China and India. You'll also notice that the amount of oil in these offshore off-limit areas are likely to be negligible in the long run. Fully exploring the areas that we currently drill will likely produce far more oil. Opening the off-limit areas will not affect the world supply and will certainly have little effect on the price of gas. But it will line the pockets of anyone who can drill. Remember the price of gas is largely dictated by world supply and world demand - the notion that the US is an insulated market is hogwash. So why would John McCain and the GOP support such a measure?
What I want to know is how does Norway consume so little and how do we get that kind of consumption level over here? At least as a step one. I used to think that hell we were in good shape since McCain doesn't have any oil ties, but sweet merciful crap this drill baby drill crap is creepy.
I think the main reason Norway consumes so little is because it has a population of around 4 million, compared with the US of a little over 300 million. If the US had the same consumption rate, it would still consume about 75% of what it currently does. A 25% reduction would still be significant of course.
As Jeremy points out, this graph is for the entire population of each country. Norway is about 1/100th the size of the US.
For that type of info see Energy Consumption PER CAPITA from NationMaster.
Interesting labeling on the first graph.
While the US is the third largest 'major producer' they are at the bottom of the 'major consumer' list.
Perhaps an overall 'net production/consumption' graph might be more useful.
If we graph the net difference, the US would still be at the bottom (-12.6 million barrels/day). Yes we produce quite a bit, but we consume A LOT.
BTW that graph was from the Energy Supply page on the Global Education Project.