CNN, like most other MSM outfits have been sacrificing reporters, foreign correspondents in favor of pundits (aka political operatives), fancy gizmos (verging on a reenactment of Star Wars) and fluff. The canceling of their science journalism department is just the latest decision that underscores the decay of private-sponsored journalism in this country. Is it the MSM's fault or does it say something about the whims and wishes of the general public?
Sad. PZ says it best.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Bloggers like to talk about how nasty the Main Stream Media is (I'm looking at you physioprof). And although I agree that there are MANY problems, I think that the fifth estate makes a real contribution to our public discourse.
Now unlike what others have written, I am not talking about science…
As a scientist, I traffic in data, ideas, models and theories.
I spend a lot of time thinking about how the whole process works. And many scientists and science philosophers have thought about this as well. One inescapable fact: humans tend to duck, deny and fool themselves into believing certain…
As part of my job I occasionally get emails from young people (well, younger than me) who want to know this or that about science communication. I don't know why they ask me, I feel I know about as much about the subject as they do, but that's the way it is. (They also ask for career advice,…
Yesterday, many among us were aghast to learn that yet another major news outlet is eliminating its science coverage. In this case it was CNN, which decided to nix its seven-person unit on science, the environment, and technology--including six producers and veteran space correspondent Miles O'…
Hi,
I was just wondering if you could do some in depth posts on what we know about the origin of the genetic code and/or the origin of life. There's a lot of sites out there that have drastically overimplified explanations of these things, but I'd be interested in seeing something deeper.
Just a suggestion,
Ryan