Zerhouni on the Stimulus Package and Science Funding

There is a lot of fear and worry in the scientific community as it is becoming more apparent that the financial crisis is impacting University endowments and state funding of public universities. Postdocs applying for faculty positions are especially nervous.

So how will science funding look in the next few years? There are rumours circulating that the NIH will receive a huge boost as part of the stimulus package. But these are just rumors. Here is some info from Zerhouni, the current NIH director who will be stepping down in the near future:

Nature:What solution do you see to the NIH financial crisis?

Zerhouni: The solution is that the economic situation has to turn around. I studied the NIH budget over time. And it's directly correlated with the federal surplus and gross domestic product growth.

But look at the situation today. The economic stimulus package is $500 billion, with $1 billion for science. It's outrageous. This is the future of our country. So now we're subsidizing the industries of the past at the expense of investments in the industries of the future. It's almost an insult, frankly.

I wonder how the "$1 billion for science" would be distributed.

To read the whole interview follow this link to the Nature article.

h/t: Juniorprof

More like this

The lack of posts can be explained by this equation (lab work = 1/updates) so I'll make it up to you with a weekend smorgasbord of links. So today as I sit in my warm cozy snowed-in apartment I present to you the latest edition of Tib Bits. First off, I would like to wish happy birthday to the late…
by revere [Since my colleague and new blog sibling Dave Ozonoff posted here some advice on NIH grant writing in response to a post of mine over at Effect Measure, I thought I'd cross-post a follow-up I did on NIH funding a few days later. BTW, Dave, I'll have to give you some lessons in snarkiness…
In the late 1990s congress decided to invest in our future by doubling the NIH budget. If you are a scientist today trying to get an NIH grant, however, you are in tough shape. Success rates are falling like a stone, with less than 20% of grant applications now being funded. It is common to submit…
Good morning. First, briefly, we have a podcast of yesterday's radio show here, a brand new book review of Scott's Evolution vs. Creationism here, and a new Congo Memoir here. The minimal funding levels for science in the currently debated bill have been replaced, owing to activities of Senators…

Please stop whining about how much of the stolen money you will receive.

By Rob Biddle (not verified) on 17 Dec 2008 #permalink