IT failures nudge out democracy

It does not matter what the candidates think or what the voters think if voter database management and voting technology problems determine the outcome of the next election.

...a new study by Common Cause and the Century Foundation finds that 10 very vital swing states have significant voting problems that have not been addressed since the last election.

Those 10 states, according to Common Cause, are Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

And, an important agency charged with keeping election officials informed of voting technology problems appears to not have been doing their jobs.

Details can be found in this report by CNN and this report in PDF form by Common Cause.

More like this

The relationship between the popular vote, roughly reflected in national polls, and the Electoral College vote, is where the rubber meets the road. When you look at states that are very solid for each candidate, neither candidate has a lock on the race, but Clinton has way more electoral votes,…
There are some interesting, and in some cases, potentially disturbing, things going on with the state by state numbers in the current election. Most of this has to do with third party candidates, and most of it with Gary Johnson. First, I'll note, that despite fears among liberals and progressives…
No. Many many people, well intended, smart people, keep talking about the rout, the landslide, that will happen. They may be basing this on the new trend started by FiveThirtyEight and picked up by the New York Times and others of deriving a probability statement about the race. But when you see…
The 2016 Electoral Vote Prediction I'm finished making predictions for the 2016 Presidential Election contest. According to my model, Hillary Clinton will win with 310 electoral votes to Donald Trump's 228 electoral votes. The map is shown above. Caveats and wrongosities: My model puts Iowa barely…

I was an active participant in the design and implementation of RI's Central Voter Registration System. It's a pretty solid and secure system So no failure in RI.

The system was completely redundant and based in at a minimum of two location should physical disaster take out one site. It's also on a protected network and the only internet availability is a voter database replica on a MySQL server. In it you can lookup your voting records, etc.

RI has a fairly decent paper ballot based system. It's the scanning systems I'm leary about. But here in RI the problem is more lack of political interest than anything.

Tony: Personally, I think the only valid system will have these characteristics:

1) The ballot is paper and unambiguously designed.

2) If there is electronic technology, it is to produce and read ballots, not to record the vote. If a touch screen marked a paper ballot that the voter then takes to a different location (a few feet away) and submits, that is fine;l

3) Any technology used is NOT produced by a commercial company. Ever.

Even if voting systems actually are ratproof (hah!), so long as they are seen as corruptible, that perception fuels distrust, discouragement, and worse.

At this point, anything less than an impartially administered and heavily audited paper balloting system is a direct attack on democracy.

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 20 Sep 2008 #permalink

The CNN report reads like the reporter failed to read the GAO report. That they didn't link to that report adds to my suspicion. You can read it online (PDF)

The GAO report focused on NIST and the Election Assistance Commission and their responsibilities in accrediting the labs that test voting machines. To borrow from a blog post I made on the topic:

"The main thrust of the GAO criticism is that the supporting materials - the standards and program manuals - have not adequately defined all the aspects of an effective testing regime. What standards and practices have been put in place are not sufficiently delineated to the point where they can be used repeatedly and consistently. Now the GAO acknowledges that the EAC has responded to the report by taking some necessary first steps, but more needs to be done."

By David Bruggeman (not verified) on 20 Sep 2008 #permalink