Nation's ecological scientists weigh in on biofuels

The 10,000 member Ecological Society of America released a position statement "that offers the ecological principles necessary for biofuels to help decrease dependence on fossil fuels and reduce carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to global climate change."

Supplying the emerging biofuels industry with enough biomass to meet the U.S. biofuel energy target - replacing 30 percent of the current U.S. petroleum consumption with biofuels by 2030 - will have a major impact on the management and sustainability of many U.S. ecosystems. Biofuels have great potential, but the ecological impacts of their development and use must be examined and addressed if they are to become a sustainable energy source.

Their press release says this:

"Current grain-based ethanol production systems damage soil and water resources in the U.S. and are only profitable in the context of tax breaks and tariffs....Future systems based on a combination of cellulosic materials and grain could be equally degrading to the environment, with potentially little carbon savings, unless steps are taken now that incorporate principles of ecological sustainability."

The actual statement the press release refers to argues that three ecological principles in particular are necessary:

1. SYSTEMS THINKING: Looking at the complete picture of how much energy is produced versus how much is consumed by extracting and transporting the crops used for biofuels. A systems approach seeks to avoid or minimize undesirable production side effects such as soil erosion and contamination of groundwater. Consistent monitoring is critical to ensure that biofuel production is sustainable.

2. CONSERVATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Maximizing crop yield without regard to negative side effects is easy. On the other hand, growing crops and retaining the other services provided by the land is far more challenging, but very much worth the effort. For example, lower yields from an unfertilized native prairie may be acceptable in light of the other benefits, such as minimized flooding, fewer pests, groundwater recharge, and improved water quality because no fertilizer is needed.

3. SCALE ALIGNMENT: How agriculture is managed matters at the individual farm, regional, and global level. Policies must provide incentives for managing land in a sustainable way. They should also encourage the development of biofuels from various sources.

(Though no word on addressing consumption patterns.)

_______________
Thanks to World's Fair contributor Jody Roberts for the link.

More like this

The 10,000 member Ecological Society of America released a position statement "that offers the ecological principles necessary for biofuels to help decrease dependence on fossil fuels and reduce carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to global climate change."

It's nice to see them being willing to take a close macro and micro view on this. There is a nice post on the Island of Doubt about switchgrass, which could end up being a big part of the mix here.
Dave Briggs :~)

The hope is that biofuels allow the US and other Western countries a political reason to eliminate wasteful farm subsidy programs, the reality may be (as evidenced by ADM's ethanol pork-barrel goldmine) that vested political interests will subvert and the process and give us something even worse

At this present moment we shuld try to release a high yielding variey of maize,jatropha,canola etc plant species which can be used as biofuel source.
however we have huge amount of land in the world as desert condition.so,we can bring this land under cultivation.and this condition the best suitable varitey has following criteria such as
1.drought resistant.
2.short duration.
3.long root system.
4.tolerant wind and cold