Ignoring: not just for kids anymore

At the risk of starting an infectious cancer/HIV/AIDS fight over at The Loom, I'll point your attention to Carl's post discussing, well, those topics here. He elaborates on a study I mentioned here but didn't delve very much into the science. Zimmer does--check out the link to find out how he relates it to HIV.

More like this

So, much attention has been drawn to my comment pointing out that Rebecca Culshaw is a mathematician (well, isn't she?), while my elaboration in my very next comment was ignored. So I thought I'd take some time to highlight this, and discuss the problems in general with arguments from authority…
Lots of changes here at Scienceblogs today. The editors of Seed magazine give the lowdown at Stochastic: Welcome to the new ScienceBlogs! Beginning today, you'll notice a newly designed homepage (built from your feedback) at scienceblogs.com and the addition of 25 new blogs to our network. *** We…
HT erv. This is truly annoying because it is so patently wrong. It's wrong in lots of different ways, but I'll help point out some of the major flaws. What happens when journalist becomes the story, rather than reports it? You see, there is this journalist, Celia Farber, who apparently has been…
The fight against HIV occurs on several different levels: prevention of transmission and acquisition, treatment of the infection, and prevention and treatment of opportunistic illnesses. Prevention has been addressed extensively (and perhaps will be again later), and opportunistic illnesses is a…

Thanks for the link Tara. Sounds like the virus is not present in the carcinoma cells themselves but in a very low frequency of adjacent stromal cells. I wonder what they'll make of that.