Sunday Function

As we get closer to Halloween, let's take a look at one of the few functions that might cause a stir in Salem. I give you the Witch of Agnesi, for several values of its free parameter a:

i-73c54559290b8ace00a1a4d0c9a4a9f7-witch1

The Witch is a geometric construction involving triangles that's easier to show than describe:

i-35873c6655418803670dfa91493c5194-witch2

(Both images are from the Wikipedia article)

Geometric construction though it is, you can also write it in closed form as a standard old function of x:

i-8ae1d3200336c7710efb70e60eb0d40f-1

Why did this seemingly mundane function merit such a creepy name? It was originally named by the Italian mathematician Maria Gaetana Agnesi, who called it la versiera, apparently a nautical term meaning "a rope which turns a sail". This fits pretty well with the geometric picture of how the curve is drawn. Somehow the English translator managed to read la versiera as l'avversiera - a she-devil. To this day we're still calling this curve "The Witch of Agnesi".

The curve happens to represent a probability density function useful in physics and elsewhere. The particular distribution is the Cauchy distribution. It's a little screwy since neither its mean nor its variance are well-defined. It also happens to describe a driven oscillator near resonance.

It's a nice function to have around. I don't expect physics will have to summon the Spanish Inquisition on it!

More like this

If you look at an incandescent light in a spectroscope, you'll see a broad and continuous range of light emitted over a large portion of the visible spectrum. This combination of colors looks white to us. At the other extreme, laser light generally consists of just a tiny slice of the frequency…
...you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk? - Dirty Harry The laws of probability, like most of the mathematical rules that govern the world, are a relatively recent discovery. Ancient people like the Romans loved to gamble as much as we do, and they had at…
What is a hill? I mean, how do you define a hill as opposed to a mountain, or, flat, level ground. The reality is that all surfaces on the planet which aren't artificial seem to have discontinuities and wrinkles on the macroscale.1 Here is a dictionary definition: A well-defined natural…
We've done a lot of discussion of the concept of integrals of a function here on this blog. Their definitions and applications are so broad as to defy any one-sentence description, but one of the most basic is the idea of the area under a curve. More precisely it's the signed area under the curve…

I thought the variance is well defined but that it's infinity. It crops up quite a bit in stats textbooks, as a counter-example to limit theorems, for example the Law of Large Numbers.

It's kind of a matter of preference. Formally infinity isn't a number, so saying an expression "equals infinity" is a shorthand for a specific type of limit behavior. In physics nobody cares about the distinction, but mathematicians might look askance a about saying the variance was infinite without further formal description of just what that means in this context.

No, neither the mean or the variance exist, because the required integrals diverge (to infinity).

As a counter example to limit theorems, the Cauchy distribution provides this: if you have the "standard cauchy" (peak at zero, scale parameter =1), the mean of a random sample of size n has the same distribution - a glaring difference to what we are used to seeing.

Agnesi (1718 - 1799) is of course a famous example of an early female mathematician who was so successful that she was offered a chair at the University of Bologna in 1750. Bologna seems in the 18th century to have been particularly progressive in terms of female appointments as it appointed one of Agnesi's contemporaries Laura Bassi (1711 - 1778) to the chair of philosophy in 1734 where she was a key figure in the introduction of Newtonian physics into Italy.

that animation is lovely.

thanks, merril

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Merrill

wikipedia is fantastic. i wonder if kids will be able to learn more, because information is easier to obtain, or just get intellectually lazy, becuase no effort is required to find the information.

Also, if you leave the circle in the plot at the end it looks (vaguely) like a face with hair flowing out both sides! Now we just need a pointy hat to go on top. Perhaps y = c - x ?

By murgadroid (not verified) on 06 Oct 2008 #permalink