Sunday Function

Let's start with a pretty simple function. It's not this week's official Sunday Function, but we'll use it to get there.

i-7b7142f1efa09b47c3b8242f89bcb9f4-graph.png
i-d4bb9fe09d6b78eb832985821d8a307f-1.png

Take the number 1, divide it by x. Pretty easy. Now imagine putting a dot at the point x = 1 on the x axis, and draw a line straight up from there to the curve formed by the graph of the function. Then do the same thing for another point on the x axis (with x > 1). Shade in the area in between the lines. Ok, that might be a little hard to visualize if you've never done it before. Let me pick the other number to be x = 4, and I'll actually put the picture below the next paragraph.

Now you or I could have picked any number, not just 4. It stands to reason that the bigger the number we picked, the more area will be in the shaded region. The area of that shaded region is itself a function. We ought to give it a name. How about log(x)?

i-3fdee7de4197c08986e3407853fa09fa-graph2.png

Log(x), huh? Isn't there already a function with that name? Yes, the natural logarithm. It's this very function. Our Sunday Function! Now let's try to qualitatively determine some of its properties. As x grows larger, our function 1/x gets very small. That means we're not adding area very rapidly as we extend the shaded region farther to the right. The log function is in fact very slowly growing. It never stops, and if you pick an x big enough log(x) will also get very large. But it does so quite slowly. If you want log(x) = 10, x is going to have to be more than 22,000.

Since this is a natural logarithm, we might expect the number e to be lurking about somewhere. It is. If the total shaded area is 1, the x you will have to have picked is e = 2.718...

i-d3fdbda776403268fadccbd8598f89a3-graph3.png

Neat, huh? The world of mathematics yields some unusual jewels, and one of my favorites is this relationship between the humble 1/x and the dramatic and ubiquitous exponential function.

[Note: I have followed the standard convention that the natural logarithm is denoted as log(x). In introductory treatments it's usually denoted ln(x).]

More like this

Today is Easter Sunday, the most sacred and second most widely observed holy day in the Christian calendar, celebrating the resurrection of Jesus. Friday was Good Friday, the remembrance of the crucifixion. Thus after spending three days buried, Jesus rose from the dead. Wait, three days? Let's…
Edit: The previous version of this post required some fixing, as I boneheadedly mixed up the O and Ω notations. The rest of it should still be good. When you invest in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or just about any other major investment vehicle, you'll hear a standard but important disclaimer. "…
Before her career took an unfortunate wrong turn, a young and talented Lindsay Lohan gave us a charming and popular comedy called Mean Girls. Time has been good to the careers of some of the others involved, Tiny Fey and Rachel McAdams perhaps most notably. But the film did something that very…
Here's a simple function that's not so often found in mathematical physics, but it's still a nice showpiece for exhibiting some interesting behavior: I've only plotted it for positive real x, because for x less than zero it starts spitting out complex numbers in a very unfriendly way. We're only…

One thing we liked about the 1/x function in school was its surface/volume of revolution. Rotate the 1/x function about the x-axis, and take the region from x=1 to x->inf. The resulting object has a finite volume but an infinite surface area, so while you could fill it up, you could never paint it.

But, Toad -- what if I filled it up with paint? ;-)

Does this mean you could paint the inside surface, but not the outside surface?

By Hank Roberts (not verified) on 08 Mar 2009 #permalink

Longtime Sunday Function fan, first-time commenter (I think). This was a particular highlight for me -- I had never understood natural logarithms until just now. Great post.

Coolio! I wish I had access to these great syntheses when I was taking calculus in high-school. Just one question: Why didn't you explicitly state that the area under the curve y=1/x is the integral?

"Why didn't you explicitly state that the area under the curve y=1/x is the integral?"

Hard to do without getting carried away and turning it into a complete Calc 1 course. ;)

Hard to do without getting carried away and turning it into a complete Calc 1 course.

Go for it, dude! Seriously, I bet you could write a really useful big-picture short calculus book that would be useful as an accompaniment to the usual detailed problem-based textbooks.

Another great post. I have my calc students make sums from 1 to 2 with 4, then 8, then 12 rectangles before we let the calculators tell us what is going on. Very cool.

Matt, this was hot. The only thing that would have made me lose complete bladder control was seeing a little "dx" action thrown in there. I do love a sexy equation.

What program did you use to draw the graphs?

By J Meckley (not verified) on 08 Mar 2009 #permalink

Hank Roberts: the inner and outer surfaces have the same (infinite) area. So, you could fill the volume, but you could not paint the inside surface. It can take a while to wrap one's mind around it.

#11, I drew the graphs with Mathematica 6 and filled in the shaded area and text in Photoshop.

Good call on the Gabriel's Horn, several of you. I smell another Sunday Function idea!

This is one superb post. I love such connections - they are lurking somewhere but have to be pulled out like a rabbit out of a hat!

Nary ( New Delhi / India)

By Bala Narayanaswamy (not verified) on 09 Mar 2009 #permalink