On Comments

I've noticed that the comments have been kind of nasty lately around here, and I just wanted to remind everyone of my comment policy. The major part of it can be summed up as "please make an effort not to be a complete jerk." Look, I know we all get angry sometimes and say what we oughtn't - me too. But for the most part I expect you to keep such incidents to a comparative minimum, say what you oughtn't fairly creatively, without resorting to obvious expletive, and confine your insults, if you must offer them, to me. That is, within reason you are free to call me a jerk or an idiot or whatever, although again, greater imagination is always rewarded. I figure this is part of the deal with blogging - you open yourself up to, let's just call it, the free flow of debate. That doesn't mean I'll tolerate everything, but for the most part, you can say what you like about me - I'm a big girl.

But I don't think that merely commenting on a blog - even commenting regularly - represents the same kind of opening yourself up to attack that blogging does. So where I do draw the line is in the kind of nasty personal attacks that have occurred *between* readers lately. If you can't make your point without name calling your fellow commenters, you won't be permitted to make it. I don't mind fierce argument, or passion, but keep the personal attacks out of it - or save them for when I say something stupid ;-).

Sharon

More like this

I have nothing to do with the recent kerfuffle about civility and comment policies that has been meandering through science blogs, but a large quantity of posts on the subject on a largeish number of blogs has, I admit, gotten me thinking about my own comment policies. Since I often get queries,…
On his campaign website, Romney has listed ten incidents that supposedly mean McCain is unstable. Let's review them: 1. Defending His Amnesty Bill, Sen. McCain Lost His Temper And "Screamed, 'F*ck You!' At Texas Sen. John Cornyn" (R-TX). "Presidential hopeful John McCain - who has been dogged for…
So I've been offline a lot the last few weeks - as you know we had 10 kids in our house for a couple of days the week before Thanksgiving, and I was out of town until yesterday. While a few posts have gone up, I've spent absolutely no time on anything other than absolute necessities online. So…
Mr. Esmay replied to my last post. His reply can be found here. I am moving this up here because it will be fairly long and detailed and deserves to be its own post. He writes: Argh. Because you still choose to hash these out as public arguments on your front page, here is my response: Perhaps it'…

Sharon,

On DraftResource.com/chat2 (about keeping draft horses), I recommend "talk about the horses, not the visitors to the site."

Gossipy comments - talking about people - turn the focus from ideas and growth to defensiveness and social positions, and get divisive, too. I consider "gossip" to be one of the true social evils.

I hope you get the change in comments you are looking for. The words we use, the comments we make and the choices we make on what and how to share - all define and change how we think, and affect who we are. Harsh words cannot be recalled, and they define us to ourselves and others.

Blessed be.

Sharon,
Thanks so much for the reminder! I love the passion that your readers bring to the blog but I detest the infantile name calling that sometimes pops up.

When people get defensive - there isn't room for good conversation and exploration of differing viewpoints, just sucking it in or blowing it up.

Eric

By Eric Smith (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 #permalink

Could you, perhaps edited to keep it short and PG, show a particularly egregious example or two?