Yet Another Wave of Global Unrest?

From Simon Black at Business Insider:

The researchers’ analysis went a step further, though; they modeled the relationship between food prices and social unrest to reach a simple conclusion– whenever the UN Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)’s global food price index climbs above 210, conditions ripen for social unrest.

Read more:

We're currently at 213.  Read the whole thing, including Black's exhortation to get a garden, at least.  Not that that's news if you read here regularly.


More like this

Last year at the 2010 ASPO conference (and over the years at other places) I've highlighted the connection between oil prices and food prices - and the ways that our increasingly tightly tied oil and food systems unravel together. If you missed these graphs last week, they'll give you the…
If you want to see it in color, all you have to do is google image up a history of the price of oil and superimpose it on the price of various staple crops. Take a look at oil and then rice, soybeans, wheat and corn. Look closely at 2008, and at the present. I will put up a visual presentation…
The seed is starting to take shape as the site and symbol of freedom in the age of manipulation and monopoly of life. The seed is not big and powerful, but can become alive as a sign of resistance and creativity in th smallest of huts or gardens and the poorest of families. In smallness lies power…
From Yale Environment 360, more questions about future UN population projections: For now, we can indeed be highly confident that world population will top 7 billion by the end of this year. We're close to that number already and currently adding about 216,000 people per day. But the United Nations…

Sharon, I love your writing and perspectives, and usually when you link to outside material it's very worth it. I looked around a bit on, though, and I have to say I'm a bit perturbed by the ideology espoused there. It smacks of the ultra-libertarian 'sovereign citizen' movement here in the states. It seems especially disturbing to me that Black emphasizes wealth and advocates simply leaving to a safe haven when the going gets tough. Based on his about page, he seems to think true freedom can only be achieved through wealth, which is a rather narcissistic approach in a world that's contracting economically and will probably send more and more people into poverty in the near future.

I'd be interested to know more about why you pointed out this piece in particular. It is interesting to note that even people with very different ideologies can see trouble on the horizon. It's also worthwhile to see that people with capital are starting to realize the value of farmland. Still, I appreciate your perspective of promoting resilience and community more than Black's idea of buying land in Uruguay so he can move there and live high on the hog when the going gets tough in the US. Are there other salient points in his piece that I'm missing?

...except for the part where he says that "Long-term, technology will ultimately solve these problems…" Aside from that, I'm generally with him.

I got a good laugh out of that sentence of his too, Michelle.

By Stephen B. (not verified) on 28 Sep 2012 #permalink