Hubble redux

Mmm. With 48 hours to go for the extended Hubble proposal deadline, about 360 new proposals have been received.
A lot of these will be reworked ACS proposals, noting that if they only get 4-10 times more orbits, they could mostly do what the ACS could do with, but with WFPC2...

And some will be innovative and important proposals to use NICMOS or WFPC2 to do science of lasting value... ;-)

UPDATE: if I read the latest correctly, they offset the phase I proposal numbers, so that the late proposals start at 1000 - in which case only just over 100 were in wednesday night. Which seems plausible. We'll see how high we get tonight.
Anyone have numbers between 800 and 999?

Proposed budget for NASA for '08 came out, I have read it, I will comment.
It is bad and good.

A notable omission - there is no line item funding for Astrobiology or the NASA Astrobiology Institute.
Just a side line mentioning that Planetary Science R&A can fund astrobiology.
There is also the Astrobiology Field Lab for Mars, and Exploration notes the usefulness of the Constellation launchers in doing astrobiology. Really.

Tags

More like this

It was NASA proposal season last month, meant to comment on it, but was so exhausted and pissed off about the whole thing that I needed some space. A typical proposals is 15 pages of main text; including biblio, bios, associated documents and blurbs the final (electronic) package is typically 40-55…
News item at NASA HQ website: The B-side power supply on the ACS has crapped out Not good, since they switched to it when the A-side went flakey. May be fixable. Or not. PS: there was a 3pm telecon on the status of HST today if anyone was on it, let me know what they said. If there was anything new…
Yo yo yo. Don't forget the Hubble Cycle 16 Supplemental is due at 11:59 pm sharp, and that is Eastern Standard Time, not some laid back later west coast time. Rumour is that NICMOS did not come back from the warmup during restart, and that it will be WFPC2 and ACS Solar Blind Channel only. Unless…
President's proposed 2008 NASA budget all glorious 623 pages, in full colour PDF. So, where to begin: Here is the slide version for lite readin' NASAwatch has a good summary of links, including Griffin's spin Science opines The bottom line is roughly as Science notes - the story is in the out year…

I have not yet begun to propose!

Seriously, the flurry of NICMOS programs is impressive. Cycle 16 should be renamed Cycle 1.6

By Brad Holden (not verified) on 07 Feb 2007 #permalink

You mean 6.6?
NICMOS is one of them latecomer newfangled instruments, specially now that the crooked dewar is not needed.
Some of us really miss the high speed photometer!