So far, in the 100 days of 2007, there have been 118 papers submitted to arXiv with the words dark, energy, model in the abstract.
This is across all of physics, most are in or cross-posted to astro-ph.
There are 154 papers with dark, matter, model in the abstract
We are only on day 100 of the year.
Limiting ourselves to just the title, there are 78 papers with "dark energy" in the title.
64 of which were on or cross-posted to astro-ph.
Too much? Or not enough?
Anyone actually reading them all?
In the last four years there have been 1000 over papers on arXiv with dark energy in the title, so the pace is accelerating...
(why, yes, I am catching up with astro-ph!)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
"There is no use trying; one can't believe impossible things."
"I dare say you haven't had much practice. When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
This week, a short, innocuous little astrophysics…
"A cosmic mystery of immense proportions, once seemingly on the verge of solution, has deepened and left astronomers and astrophysicists more baffled than ever. The crux ... is that the vast majority of the mass of the universe seems to be missing." -William J. Broad
Despite the wondrous, luminous…
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is just opinion." -Democritus of Abdera
When you take a look out at the Universe, past the objects in our own solar system, beyond the stars, dust and nebulae within our own galaxy, and out into the void of intergalactic space, what is…
Simon White has written a treatise published on astro-ph (arXiv:0704.2291v1) where he argues that Dark Energy, or, more specifically, the current bandwagon of interest in Dark Energy, is potentially harmful for astronomy.
Despite the fact that I'm deeply interested in cosmology and Dark Energy,…
So keep us informed of any possible best sellers. How many researchers are in the field?
It would be interesting to look at the productivity per person in various fields - do some have many short papers with others bigger collaborative things. The arXiv data set must be somewhat skewed but still ought to be interesting...
I at least read the abstract of each. And it's not my primary or secondary area!
I just drove round trip to hand-deliver an application package for a tenure-track Math professorship. I've been an adjunct Astronomy professor. I mostly publish mathematical biology, nonlinear stuff, complexity stuff, and mathematical economics. But...
It looks to me as if the anomalies are so numerous and so obviously important to the "mainstream" that we are deep into a Kuhnian Paradigm Crisis. It is easiest to see in Astrophysics, Cosmology, Particle Physics, Field Theory, and the like... so the terms "dark matter" and "dark energy" -- although they may turn out to be the modern equivalent of Phlogiston (or maybe the they're Caloric and Strings are Phlogiston) -- that's where the breakdown is most obvious. If there are 100 papers, the odds that any one is right are no more than 1%. But someone's going to win a Nobel Prize -- when the new paradigm is established.
Exciting time to be alive. And guess what: the referees will not reject a paper for merely being crazy. All these papers are crazy.
I would just like to point out that I am not responsible for any of these papers.
(How about with "inflation" in the title? Then I would be guilty.)
Regarding the accelerating pace - when do we reach the phase that Krauss and Scherrer recently wrote about when only one of the papers is within our horizon?
Much Ado About Nothing--recent experience shows what the refereees favour, as well as their politics. Every paper written about DE decreases the chances of one being right.
Notwithstanding Krauss and Scherrer, the actual trend is towards more and more papers with more and more coauthors about narrower and narrower topics, converging asymptotically on the "LPU = Least Publishable Unit."
Is this blog comment a LPU? If not, I can make it shorter.
Jonathan: Yes, I think you should shorten your post and submit it to astro-ph at once. However, LPUs will evaporate like mini-black holes. Careful study of the decay of short preprints may eliminate the need for the LHC.
How many of them were about Naomi Campbell?